Heartbreaker by Sarah MacLean

Heartbreaker is the second book in the Hell’s Belles series. It’s a jam packed book – there’s a road trip with racing carriages, highwaymen, kissing, stabbings, witty banter, a duke, a thief, and the last room at the Inn, with only one bed, of course. It all adds up to a very good time.

The book begins off with a bang. In the opening scene, our heroine Adelaide Frampton is at her wedding, which quickly turns into a riot between two very violent, rival gangs, one of which is run by her father. She escapes and ultimately joins the Hell’s Belles, a group of very strong women. Though society knows them as part of the ton, their passion is taking down aristocrats that abuse their power and then helping save the women those aristocrats have harmed. Among other things, the Belles work to prevent young women from marrying rogues and scoundrels. Adelaide is their Matchbreaker, the one who exposes dirty secrets and breaks matches. She is skilled, brilliant, fearless, and awesome.

Adelaide grew up the daughter of a crime boss and had to pick pockets just to survive. After escaping her father, she changed her name and was taken in by The Duchess, leader of the Belles. Adelaide has bright red hair and spectacles but disguises herself as a wallflower at balls so that no one recognizes her as the daughter of a famous London criminal.

She first meets Henry, the Duke of Clayborn, at a ballroom in Mayfair where he speaks rudely to her and she believes he is a cold and arrogant. Clayborn has a flawless reputation but unlike many of his peers is passionate about changing the law in order to end child labor.

Early in the book, Adelaide is breaking into her father’s desk to retrieve information to help the Belles. She finds the information she wants but also sees he has hidden away a wooden puzzle box. Sure it must somehow be important, she takes it, too. She is leaving when, much to her surprise, Clayborn appears and stops her. He doesn’t know the office they are in is her father’s, but the puzzle box she has taken is his,  and he very much needs it back. Her father’s goons appear and the two work together to escape.

The next day, she is called to a meeting with Clayborn. His younger brother John, Lord Carrington, has run off to Gretna Green with Lady Helene, a young woman Adelaide is trying to find. Helene, Lord Havistock’s daughter, witnessed her truly awful father commit murder and the Belles want to spirit her to safety where she will then be able to testify against Havistock. Adelaide is determined to rescue Helene before she can wed, but Clayborn wants to see them married because he believes they are in love. And so the race is on as Adelaide and Clayborn each try to catch up with the young couple.

MacLean has penned a rip roaring adventure. I loved watching Adelaide and Clayborn fall for each other and seeing the Belles use their vast network of spies, disguises and explosives to help them along the way.  The two of them are perfect for each other but of course it takes them some time – and embraces – for them to see this.

I had a few quibbles. At one point, Clayborn is knifed in a fight and lies unconscious for four days. When he awakes he gets up, has a shave, and has a long love scene with Adelaide. I wondered how he had the strength to manage that? Also,  Adelaide spends too much time in repeat mode protesting why she and Clayborn can’t be together. Again and again, she says she isn’t good for him, that he is a Duke, and she is a thief and they cannot be together. It was tedious.

But, in general, I really enjoyed this book. And if readers haven’t read the first book in the series, Bombshell, they needn’t worry, because it stands up well on its own. Heartbreaker ends with a lead in to the next book which looks to feature Lady Imogen, the Belle who’s a chemistry (and explosives) expert, and Detective Inspector Thomas Peck. I can’t wait!

Buy it at: Amazon, Audible or your local independent retailer

Visit our Amazon Storefront

Kayne Spooner

Kayne Spooner

Kayne Spooner is an avid reader of all genres, but it's romance books that have always swept her off her feet. Kayne gravitates toward stories with humor and furry sidekicks, although really, if there's a happy ever after, she's here for it!
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

26 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Kenna Ryan

This was too similar to Tessa Dare’s A Week to Be Wicked for me. From the spectacled wallflower to the road trip with competing interests and the enclave of spinsters a la Spindle Cove, I just felt I’d read this book before and much better done by Dare.

Dabney Grinnan

A Week to Be Wicked is so good. I hadn’t thought of the similarities but you are right!

Lisa Fernandes

This isn’t my favorite McLean – would rank it at around a B-flat.

Kim

I didn’t care for this book at all. All SM’s heroines are one-note wonders: historically inaccurate feminists that always have to be superheroes. It’s as if the author keeps shouting to readers how wonderful and progressive her heroine is without putting in the effort to develop the character.

Adelaide’s background is intriguing, but it never made sense that her father allowed her to so easily leave. Also, she’s supposed to care about her assignments, yet she endangers the lives of Lord Carrington and Lady Helene by ignoring her mission and instead nursing the duke back to health. She never even lets the Belles know that she abandoned the assignment.

Dabney Grinnan

I read it. I think MacLean does a great job with strong women, humor, and men who are worth loving.

It’s true it is not a book for historical romance purists. But it is fun, sexy, and for those who like their women empowered–even if that’s not historically likely–I think they’ll enjoy it.

Caz Owens

I really feel like “purist” is becoming a perjorative term in cases like this. I don’t think it’s unreasonable to expect a book labelled “historical” to have some actual history in it, or to be recognisably of the time in which it is set. Forgive me, my US-ian friends, but I can’t help also feeling that because the vast amount of HR is written by American authors with no real attachment to the culture of the country in which they are setting their books, they think it’s okay to basically ignore it. They would take much more care to get the background, customs and culture right if they were setting their books anywhere else in the world, but England? Oh, that’s okay, we can get it wrong and nobody will blast us on social media.

/rant.

Dabney Grinnan

Caz, I am not saying ANYTHING pejorative about you or anyone else for whom this is not their cup of tea.

Next time, I’ll say “those who prefer their historical romance to be grounded in actual history.”

Caz Owens

No, I know you weren’t, but I do see it bandied around among some authors on The Bird App where it’s definitely used as an insult.

Dabney Grinnan

Ignore the haters.

Caz Owens

It’s hard to when they are the very people peddling such a distorted view of the history of my country in their books.

WendyF

The weird thing is that Sarah Maclean is, I think, half English and, certainly before the pandemic, she used to come over to the UK regularly and spend a lot of time doing research in the British Library. I stopped reading two books into her previous series.

Caz Owens

I stopped a series or two ago.

Lynne Connolly

yes, this, a thousand times this. I’ve almost given up. In the words “historical fiction” and “historical romance,” the first word should often be dropped. I read historical fiction for the history. I know others don’t, and good luck to them, but I really want to bring history back to historical romance.
When an author like Dorothy Dunnett can write a meticulously researched series that is breathtaking, unusual, and features an utterly fearless heroine who does things her way but also belongs absolutely in her period, it would be lovely to see more people follow her example.
Or just call it fantasy. It’s not historical, so calling it that is misleading. Call it Regencylandia, or fantasy, but leave the historical bit out.

Caz Owens

Hear, hear! And you’re so right about Dunnett’s heroines. They’re complex, fascinating and completely of their time. They knock most of the current crop of HR heroines into a cocked hat.

Elaine S

Ummmm, I think we need a new sub-genre: FHR. Fantasy Historical Romance.

Caz Owens

Or Historical Romance (Not). I gave up on SM years ago. The summary of this reminds me why. I’m glad Kayne enjoyed it, but it’s the sort of book I give a very wide berth these days.

Mary Beth

Caz – Are there any current writers of historical romance that you find tolerable? I have always loved historical fiction and historical romance was my initial gateway to reading romance. I find many more recent historical romances to be almost unreadable.

Dabney Grinnan

I’d put in plugs for Julie Anne Long, Evie Dunmore, Elizabeth Everett, recent Loretta Chase, Mia Vincy, Julia Bennett, and Maya Rodale.

Mary Beth

Thanks Dabney. These are all names I have read and enjoyed. Have you read any books by Lucinda Brant?

Dabney Grinnan

I have. I enjoyed it but there is a remove to her writing that isn’t quite my thing.

Caz Owens

I concur with Dabney on Chase, Long (although I wasn’t wild about the last book of hers I read), Vincy and Dunmore. I’d add Caroline Linden and KJ Charles – who is currently the best writer of HR around – Joanna Chambers, some of Cat Sebastian’s books – her Turner series is my favourite – Sally Malcolm and Aster Glenn Gray. Stella Riley and Lucinda Brant are incredibly strong on the ‘historical’ part of HR and write wonderful romances, too. Stella Riley’s A Spendid Defiance has been a favourite for almost 40 years. I’ve reviewed books and audiobooks by both authors here and at AudioGals if you want to check them out.

I remember, when I first started reading HR more than a decade ago (like you, it was where my love of romance began), there was constant talk of the death of the genre, and yet it thrived, in the hands of some truly wonderful writers, some of whom are listed above and some – Thomas, Bourne, Duran – who are no longer active in the genre. Now, sadly, good HR as we knew it really is (mostly) gone.

Last edited 3 years ago by Caz Owens
Mary Beth

Thank you for the thoughtful reply. I too read A Splendid Defiance many years ago and I loved the book. It is such a great example of excellent historical romance. I like books that cause me to want to know more, books that send me off to do further research and reading. More recently I have discovered Lucinda Brant and her books feel authentic to me. I too mourn the loss of Thomas, Bourne and Duran – how I wish that they would take up historical romance writing again, or simply begin writing again. I am hoping for a renaissance of historical romances in the future…dreams.

Caz Owens

The trouble is… if the authors of tomorrow have only the authors of today on which to base their own experience of HR, they’ll all be way off base to start with. Cynic that I am, I’m not hopeful :(

Last edited 3 years ago by Caz Owens
Mary Beth

lol

Kenna Ryan

They will have to do the same research and make the same stumbles as us current authors. Circle of life :)