
All Fired Up
I have a confession to make. A large percentage of why I chose to read this book is because the heroine has my name. There aren’t a lot of Charlottes anywhere in literature, and the prospect of seeing a Charlotte in a romance novel, hopefully having a rollicking good time, was a real draw. Sadly, I was not all fired up by All Fired Up.
Mitch Crews is in Red Oak, Ohio to find his remaining relatives. He’s recently out of prison, and his drug-addicted mother is dead. His father hasn’t so much been in the picture as occasionally stuck his head in the frame. Now, Mitch is trying to track down his two half-siblings and their mother, his father’s ex-wife (Mitch is the product of an affair). He meets Charlotte Parrish outside a sketchy bar, when she’s dispatching two unpleasant men. Her car broke down, but she called her two bosses and pseudo-brothers, who show up on the scene and just happen to be Mitch’s actual brothers. And then their mother, Rosalyn arrives.
Taking the entire business with aplomb that would either make a therapist proud of their maturity or question their capacity for emotional denial, Mitch’s brothers and Rosalyn embrace Mitch wholeheartedly, and soon he’s settling into town, homesteading and setting up his own business. His brothers have drawn one line: don’t go after Charlotte – which is unfortunate as both Mitch and Charlotte are very mutually into each other. Mitch’s biggest problem, however, is his mother’s drug-dealing ex-boyfriend, Newman. Mitch inherited his mother’s house upon her death, and he sold it for demolishment. Unfortunately, the ex-boyfriend used it as storage for his “small fortune in crystal meth and ecstasy” and he is now out to get Mitch.
Waiting for this book to kick into gear is like waiting for your engine to warm up on a winter morning. Much of the early part of the story has to do with Mitch just catching up his brothers, Rosalyn, and Charlotte on who he is, and while it makes sense that he needs to do it, it just takes so darn long, and it’s not done particularly creatively. (An ‘information dump’ is, I believe, the term for it.) And there is way more steady development of the familial-relations and the Mitch-past storylines than the romantic one. It takes 253 pages to get to Mitch and Charlotte’s first kiss – and that’s not because Mitch has some sort of rule against kissing like Tor in The Chief which means they do all the sexy things except kiss. They literally just don’t kiss for the first 252 pages of the book.
The couple whose chemistry really keeps the lights on in this story is Rosalyn and Mitch’s dad, Elliott, who comes back to town. At one point, Rosalyn thinks how
On Elliott, everything was big—and in her youth, that had often been her downfall. Together, they could burn down the roof. Oh, how she’d loved his big body and the way he used it when pleasuring her.
Well shiver my timbers, Lori Foster. But this isn’t their book, though what a New Adult novel their origin story would have made. . .
Mitch is the supreme fantasy of an ex-con. He’s a real gentleman, and his singular crime was to do a drug run for Newman to keep his mom safe. He has a pit bull, Brute, who has his own recovering-from-doggy-PTSD storyline. Charlotte didn’t knock my socks off either.
She figured she’d eventually find a guy who was equally unassuming, just as business-minded and…boring.
Now, the point of this story is absolutely supposed to be that Mitch is the antidote and the two of them together are going to be very un-boring, but. . . I was bored. Honestly, Mitch is business-minded and unassuming.
As for the secondary characters, Mitch’s brothers own a transport company, which originally I envisioned as some sort of trucking business, but is, as Mitch puts it, a business to “buy weird shit” (I pictured some sort of Uber/Favor for Creepy Stuff service) that involves them purchasing and picking up things such as cat coffins. Cat. Coffins. I kid you not. Newman, the ex-boyfriend, and his henchmen are genuinely unsavory and there is a scene when Newman goes after Charlotte that still freaks me out when I think about it (imagine a version of the Psycho bathtub scene but with a guaranteed HEA).
If you’re looking for zero-to-sixty in three-point-eight seconds, romance and heat, this is not your book. While Foster had all the parts to build a Mustang like the ones all the Crews boys drive, the romance she’s come up with is much more of a four-door sedan.





This was an excellent book to listen too. I enjoyed his courage to change his life around and to take a prescious women under his wing. Loved it. More please
There are also the cases of two books (by different authors and completely unrelated as far as I could tell)—one with a hero named Tate Lyle and the other with a hero named Lyle Tate. I spent my childhood in England and all I could think of was Tate & Lyle’s Golden Syrup! Not really the correct frame of mind in which to read a romance.
Lori Foster has always been an enigma for me. I’ve read her on and off since she was writing for Loveswept but her immature to tstl heroine/manipulative and almost stalkerish alpha hero pairings are something I’ve outgrown.
THERE ARE NEVER ANY DABNEYS. :(
That’s a crime against humanity. Of course, look at the bright side. What if there were an *awful* romance novel where the heroine’s name was Dabney?
Make it a historical romance. “Fleeing an arranged marriage, beautiful Lady Dabney seeks refuge with the brooding and reclusive Lord Stephen ‘Slade’ Hawkstone…”
But on a more serious note, I googled the name Dabney to see the history behind it. It’s a surname of French origin, and I like the variation D’Aubney. I might use that for a character some day.
““Fleeing an arranged marriage, beautiful Lady Dabney seeks refuge with the brooding and reclusive Lord Stephen ‘Slade’ Hawkstone…” LOL. Love it!
Not are there ever any Gayles! Sometimes there is a friend named Gail or Abigail, but no Gayle.
Charlotte Hayward in Loretta Chase’s ‘Not Quite A Lady’ is one of my absolute favourite heroines in HR. Just a wonderful, wonderful book. Also, Charlie Eason in the absolutely phenomenal ‘Earth Bound’ by Emma Barry and Genevieve Turner is *technically* a Charlotte, though only her less-than-sympathetic parents ever call her by her full first name.
I could have sworn that historical romance had a decent number of Charlottes in it, but I found only seven Charlottes amidst the historicals on my bookcases, one of them technically a Lottie. The historical heroines all seem to be named Emma, Olivia, Sophie/Sophia, Katherine/Kate, Grace, or Violet. Tessa Dare definitely has another Charlotte, but I didn’t keep that book.
Lately I’m seeing a lot of Regency HRs in particular where they try to modernize the name, like the hero Charles going by Chase or Cash. Or Renaud going by Ren. And other examples like that. Not saying it couldn’t have happened, but certain nicknames scream 21st century to me.
A hero named Charles goes by Cash? I can hardly wait for, “I’m James, but my friends call me Jayden.”
“A hero named Charles goes by Cash?” I can’t remember exactly. I just have this eerie feeling of having seen it before, but the “Chase” one is definitely real. He is the hero in the Tessa Dare novel “The Governess Game.”
My memory for names and faces, whether real or fictional, is rather poor. But it would be fun if somebody posted all the odd names they’ve seen in HR. On that note, I just finished reading “A Delicate Deception” by Cat Sebastian, and the Duke of Herreford, whose last name is Lexington, goes by Lex. That one I can kind of see, but pulling “Chase” out of “Charles?” I’d say that’s stretching it a bit for the early 19th century.
“I can hardly wait for, ‘I’m James, but my friends call me Jayden.'” Ha ha! Don’t give people any ideas.
My favorite unusual name in HR is Bertrice Small’s heroine Blaze. Though Norah Hess is a close runner-up with heroines called Storm, Flame, Lark and Raven.
Nice list. The odd thing is, just doing some perfunctory research on my own, there were some unusual names in history that HR writers might want to lift instead of 21st-centurizing classic names. Case in point, when I was doing research for an erotic short story that takes place in 1717 London, I found the names “Barbary” and “Godsgift” in that time period and place. So I used them for my characters. It sure beat the heck out of saying, “Oh, my name is Jedediah but everyone calls me JD or JJ.”
And kudos to HR writers like you who can stand to do all the research necessary for a full length novel. Just finding information I needed for a 7,000 word short story was a bear of a project. How do you do it? I like that romance writer who said she prefers the storytelling to the research part (not that she doesn’t fact check!) and she said the key thing in the rough draft was to be smart enough not to park a Buick in the 1800s. That’s kind of where I’m at, and why I mostly stick to contemporaries.
Hallie Rubenhold’s THE LADY IN RED, is the true story of a scandalous 18th-century divorce. The woman at the center of the book is Lady Seymour Worsley. The book was very good, but, sadly, Rubenhold said she was unable to find any record to indicate why Lady Worsley was given the name Seymour—that would have been interesting to know.
Charles was sometimes shortened to Chas – especially in print. Maybe “Chas” sounds too common, so the authors have added the “e”… And let’s not forget all those very English dukes named Caleb or Ethan… I’m pretty sure I’ve come across a Jayden in a Regency.
I remember reading the David Cameron book and wondering how someone could be so completely clueless…
I had to give up on Lori Foster. Her heroines often do inexplicable things (such as, let the hero—a complete stranger to her—into her home, car, life) and, because the reader knows the hero is a good guy, we’re just supposed to accept that the heroine somehow intuits that. There are enough books where the heroine isn’t TSTL for me to bother with books where they do. It’s a shame because Foster has a big back-catalog, but she’s not for me.
Character names are an endless source of delight, frustration, eye-rolling, and wtf. Last year, I couldn’t even start a book because the hero had the exact name (first and last) of one of my daughter’s former boyfriends. There was zero chance I would be able to read the book without his face popping up and I knew that wouldn’t work. Lol. Then there was the case of the HR with a Scottish hero named David Cameron! Apparently neither the writer nor anyone involved in the production/publication process made the connection to UK politics. Another book I could not have read, even if HR was my jam.
I believe the popularity of the name “Charlotte” is on the upswing—perhaps because that’s the name of William and Kate’s daughter. I make no claim for myself as an outlier, but Charlotte is the middle name of one of my daughters (who is now in her twenties)—it was also my grandmother’s middle name and we chose it because we liked it and because of the family connection. Anyway, I expect you’ll be seeing a few more heroines named Charlotte in the future.
Oh, names can definitely make or break a story. I agree. As for David Cameron, I always Google a potential character name to make sure I don’t accidentally give my hero or heroine the same name as a celebrity or serial killer.
As for you not being able to start a book because it had the same name as your daughter’s ex-boyfriend, I remember I ran across a porn clip once where the guy (not very attractive, BTW) was a dead wringer for a family friend. Man, did I close my computer quick! (My eyes! My eyes!)