Blame it on the Duke

Blame It on the Duke is the third book of Lenora Bell’s Disgraceful Dukes series and it’s fitting that I’m the third reviewer here at All About Romance to give her a try.  It’s always down to a roll of the dice as to whether  a new author will produce a story that knocks your socks off or grinds your enjoyment into the dust.  Unfortunately Lenora Bell had her mortar and pestle ready and I cannot say that it was third time lucky for her.

The story opens with Nicholas, Marquess of Hatherly entertaining several of his ribald friends with a musical starring a naked opera singer.  Nick is a connoisseur of any vice he can get his privileged hands on all in the name of living life to the fullest.  Escaping into a willing woman’s arms or a bottle of French brandy is a way of coping with his father’s slow descent into madness and his own resigned acceptance  that the family curse of losing one’s mind will eventually affect him too.  Nick has no plans to change his lifestyle since the Hatherly line will die off with him, so why bother marrying?

His carefully planned evening of debauchery is interrupted when his father, the Duke of Barrington, suddenly appears on the stage during the singer’s solo.  Trying the get the Duke off stage turns the performance into a comedy as he proclaims to all that he has gambled away his son in a hand of cards.  Nick is furious to learn that the person he’d hired to watch his father was sneaking the older man out of the house to a gambling hell.  In a lucid moment, the Duke confesses that the wager was either losing their ancestral London home or having Nick marry the daughter of an upstart baronet.  There is no way that Nick will accept the terms of the wager quietly so the following day he goes to confront Sir Alfred Tombs for taking advantage of his father’s weak mind.

On the other side of town Miss Alice Tombs is informed that despite her wishes to remain unmarried her father has betrothed her to the scandalous Lord Hatherly.  Alice is not the typical English rose, instead having a desire for knowledge and a knack with languages including Sanskrit.  A marriage would curtail her plans to travel to India where she will present her translation of an ancient Indian text she found in her great-grandfather’s belongings.  Translating the dead language has been a challenge but the reward was discovering the parchments contained verses of the philosopher Vātsyāyana’s Kamasutra, complete with vivid descriptions of the physical acts between a man and woman.

When Nick arrives at her home to try and break the betrothal, Alice agrees with him that a marriage between them would be a mistake.  It is only when Nick learns of Alice’s plans to leave the country that they reconsider their position.  Being a married marchioness would give Alice more freedoms than she has as an unmarried woman, so traveling alone to another country wouldn’t be as difficult.  Having a wife practically a world away would serve Nick’s purposes to keep his degenerate lifestyle.  It’s a win-win for the two of them when Alice sweetens the pot by requesting that Nick use his considerable bedroom skills to educate her about some of the ideas she’s only read about in the Kamasutra.  Both are certain that a purely physical relationship is perfect for the two months they’ll be together before Alice’s planned trip to India, yet two months is enough for secret longings and hearts to get involved in what was supposed to be a strictly convenient marriage.

The premise for Blame It on the Duke is silly; however I’ve read other books where a blushing virgin gets lessons in love from an experienced rake that make the formulaic plotline work.  If that had been the extent of the problems in this story I would have been content to grade it a C and then move on to other things.  Unfortunately there are many issues with Ms. Bell’s writing, and the overall feeling of confusion I got while reading made me shake my head and wonder how this book got past a beta reader or editor.

Let’s start with Nick, who is probably one of the worst fake-rakes I’ve ever encountered.  He’s got a pretty sordid reputation but all of that scandal seems to conveniently melt away once he’s introduced to Alice.  He agrees to their marriage because he doesn’t see her as a temptation against all the loose and beautiful women available to shag.  Of course, once he kisses her he’s smitten and those dreams of other women are easily forgotten.  Alice becomes his sexual focus and he starts giving her his best moves and come-on lines.  I mean, who wouldn’t drop her drawers for a man who says sexy things like:

“I’ll taste the wine later,” Nick said in a low, intimate voice.  “On your lips.”

Or

“This is where the magic happens, Dimples.”

Or

“I never eat sweets.  And you’re all the sugar I need.”

The man is an absolute poet!  ‘Dimples’, by the way, is the annoying pet name he comes up with for Alice at their first meeting.  I just can’t see any Regency gentleman coming up with that nickname for a gently bred woman, but considering the smarmy way he tries to seduce her it just falls right into the ridiculousness of it all.

That Alice, a woman whose appreciation for words and language is stressed almost ad nauseum, falls for these cheesy lines is another problem.  She swears to herself up and down that she’s above swooning for any man no matter how handsome he is, and yet within minutes of their first kiss she’s dreaming of all the positions she’s read in the Kamasutra that they can try together.  I cannot understand how an author can write about a time where a woman could have been ruined by simply talking to a man unchaperoned and still have her so sexually liberated that something like the Kamasutra doesn’t scandalize her.  Sure, we’re meant to believe that Alice is looking at the text in a scholarly way, but that’s a lot like saying a man reads Playboy for the articles.

There are several other threads within Blame It on the Duke that had me rolling my eyes, and it was all just too much to filter past my reality-o-meter.  Ms. Bell obviously has a following of readers who have made her other books successful but I can’t count myself among the converted.  This wasn’t a good historical romance and new readers should probably steer clear.

Sara Elliott

Sara Elliott

I am a Fan-girl extraordinaire and romance addict. When I’m not obsessing over a fictional hero from a book I’m probably obsessing over a fictional Super-hero from the movies! I have long appreciated Romance stories and the escape they provide from all the dramas in real life. Historical Romances are my favorite (who wouldn’t want to be swept away by a handsome, rich English nobleman); however I love discovering new authors and stories in any romantic genre as long as the description sounds interesting. I’m living my own happy-ever-after in Phoenix, AZ (yes, it’s a dry heat!) with my two kids and my real-life hero.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

11 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Marian Perera

I wonder how many more books there are in this series, and whether they’ll get any better.

Caz Owens

Quite honestly, with three books all getting Ds (I think the second got a D-), I think she’s been given enough chances to improve.

GS_18

And anyone who has actually read the Kamasutra knows that it is the least erotic Sanskrit text there is. There are plenty of lush Sanskrit poetry-texts that she could have been used–the marvelous Amarusataka being one of them–to make the author’s point. You rarely see India featured in romance novels, the colonial context acknowledged even less, not to mention how the study of Indian languages, particularly Sanskrit was integral to the colonial project. Can we say not just wallpaper, but insulting wallpaper? .

Caz Owens

*nods in agreement*. I haven’t read either of those texts, but I do remember reading somewhere about the fact that the Kamasutra isn’t actually a book of sexual positions, as most people seem to assume!

Keira Soleore

India and the British Raj like slavery are almost never mentioned in romance novels though most of the nobility had their fingers in one or both of those pies and definitely knew someone who did. Real history is clearly unsexy.

And that Kamasutra horse has been beaten into the ground. Every “exotic” book featuring any sort of Indian blood gets a KSutra mention. I can imagine this is insulting wallpaper as a stand-in for real research.

Anne Marble AAR

“This is where the magic happens, Dimples.” :o Wow. :o Is George Lucas writing the romantic dialogue? What’s next? “Hold me like you did on Naboo…”?

Georgina

I see on her amazon info she has an MFA in creative writing, an award from the RWA .
Eloisa James recommends her!”……… then I threw her latest across the room when her heroine referenced there were fifty shades of grey!
like the other comments I just don’t get it, so disappointed ,normally if there’s a Duke in the title I’m in.
And another thing what is it with book covers of bare backed ladies! Sorry I sound like a grumpy old lady but its nice to know I’m not the only one who just doesn’t get this authors appeal.

Caz Owens

I remember when I read her first book and gave it a D amid the swath of praise from reviewers and a number of authors for whom I’d had a great deal of respect. But it was one of those times when I didn’t for one moment think “it must be me” (we all have those moments, don’t we, where everyone else seems to love something we hated?) because there was absolutely no question it was a terrible book. With both Em and Sara giving subsequent books similar grades… well, we can’t ALL be wrong, can we?

stl_reader

Wish I’d seen the review before…yesterday. I got this book from the library a couple of days ago and ended up reading/skimming through it. It really was bad! And did anyone notice the reference to “shock and awe”? The book was already anachronistic enough, IMHO, but deliberate use of clearly modern terms in an historical annoys the heck out of me.

Em Wittmann

I agree with all of Caz’s comments above. I’m not sure what readers like about her books? I read the first two, and I reviewed the second for AAR – I’m not surprised by the grade this time out at all. I just don’t​ get her success.

Caz Owens

That makes three duds in a row for this author. Has anyone in the history of AAR ever had that sort of strike rate? Maybe there’s someone out there who knows…

I can’t understand how these books even got PUBLISHED, let alone got past an editor.