Months earlier, Gina Forrester’s husband Rick went out to buy a newspaper, and never came back. Samantha Hayes’s In Too Deep begins with Gina trying to put the pieces of her life back together, but unable to move on because she just. doesn’t. know. Did someone murder Rick? Did he commit suicide? Did he just get tired of her, despite their being very much in love? There’s no evidence for any of these possibilities, and the police have long since given up. Six years before, Gina and Rick lived through the death of their son in a hit-and-run accident – the driver was never found – but the loss of her husband has hit her even harder.

Gina’s daughter Hannah is suffering as well. The narrative switches between the perspectives of these two women, and Hannah has a secret. She’s dropped out of college, though she can’t tell her mother this. She especially won’t tell her why, because her mother is struggling with her own problems. But then Gina gets a call from a woman called Susan who runs a hotel, and Susan wants to confirm the booking made for Gina’s upcoming anniversary – a booking made by Rick.

Surely a man planning suicide wouldn’t reserve a room in a luxury hotel for a surprise anniversary gift. Daring to hope a little, Gina decides to check into the hotel and see what, if anything, Rick might have told Susan. She takes Hannah with her, thinking this might be a nice vacation for Hannah, too. Unfortunately, Susan says she doesn’t know anything more about Rick. But she’s pleasant and friendly and she offers to introduce Hannah to her son when he comes home from college.

Disturbing things start to happen, though. Gina’s watch goes missing, and later someone wedges the door of the sauna shut when she’s inside, making her pass out from the heat and steam. Susan’s husband is supposedly away on business, but his car fits the description of the one which struck Gina’s son. And of course, everyone has something to hide, from Rick, the perfect husband, to polished, attractive Susan. The truth about why Hannah dropped out of college is especially well done. There were enough clues but it still came as a surprise to me.

Unfortunately, the revelation at the end is a letdown. It was far too implausible character-wise, and I needed an industrial crane to suspend my disbelief at that point. Also, if I ever abduct someone and they start a loud monologue that goes, ‘You don’t need to kidnap me. Please put the gun away and I’ll go with you to 851 Thornhill Road, Apartment 2B’, I’ll find the cell phone on which they secretly made a call, toss the phone out, and go to a different place.

Finally, there’s the last page. I’ll put this under a spoiler tag.

Spoiler
After everything is wrapped up, Gina is in her house with another person, and they talk about all that’s happened. She then goes to the washroom, needing a moment alone to overcome her emotions. Then she tries the door – but it’s jammed. As she struggles to open it, she realizes the other person is outside holding the door closed with a “soulless expression” on their face, and the book ends.

Wow. This would be so tense if, for instance, she was trapped in a room filling with poisoned gas. But… she’s in her own washroom. What even is the surprise villain’s plan here? This has to be the most ridiculous ending I’ve ever read in a psychological thriller, thrown in for no reason other than to produce a final Shocking Twist and with no resolution at all – because what resolution can you possibly have when the villain’s revenge is to stand outside the heroine’s washroom and hold the door shut?

So to sum it up, In Too Deep is fast-paced and tense, and it entertained me while I was reading it. But I won’t remember anything afterwards except for the last page. There are worse stories out there, but there are better ones too, and next time I’ll try one of those instead.

 

Marian Perera

Marian Perera

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

5 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Lisa Fernandes

Re spoiler

spoiler!
Marian Perera
Spoiler answer
Lisa Fernandes

Ahh, then I reserve the right to LOL. And also LMAO. EXACTLY what you said!

DiscoDollyDeb

I would have given up at “went out to buy a newspaper”. No one goes out to buy a newspaper: they’re either delivered or, more likely, read on-line. That just seems like lazy writing: the writer couldn’t come up with a better reason for getting the husband out of the house? How about he just didn’t come home from work?

Marian Perera

If the start of the story struck you as lazy writing, the end of the story would be even worse. :)