
Reckless Hearts
The second book in Jax Calder’s Rainbow Redemption series, Reckless Hearts is an angsty, deeply emotional romance that spans almost a decade. While this is the second book in the series, it can be read as a standalone; Tim, Jamie, and a couple of characters from Beautiful Hearts make cameo appearances but while it’s definitely worth reading their story, it’s not absolutely essential to do so before reading this one.
Seb Kleggs has had a crush on his sister Saskia’s best friend Marcus Johnson since the first time he laid eyes on him at the age of fifteen and promptly emptied a box of breakfast cereal all over himself. Marcus is gorgeous – handsome, charming, funny and with the type of voice that would inspire a nun to drop her underwear – and Seb quickly resigned himself to hopeless yearning from afar because there’s no way someone like Marcus would look twice at a gawky nerd like him.
Marcus and Saskia met at university and are the archetypal cool kids everyone wants to impress. Marcus is very well aware of the way people react to him and likes the way it makes him feel, but there’s a damaged psyche behind the handsome face. He knows he’s merely playing a part, the part of Marcus-the-outrageous-flirt-and-charmer that everyone expects of him – and that behind the façade, he’s an empty shell.
A few years later, when Marcus and Saskia are in their final year of university and Seb is in his first, Marcus propositions Seb when they’re at a party. There’s no way Seb is going to turn him down, even though they both know Saskia will be pissed off if she ever finds out they’ve hooked up. But that isn’t going to be a problem; neither of them is going to tell her, and besides, it’s only going to be a one-time thing, right?
Wrong. Marcus doesn’t do repeats, but there’s something about Seb – he’s so comfortably himself, so real – that makes Marcus feel something other than hollowed-out and fake for the first time in a very long time. Somehow, that one hook-up leads to two, and then to more; Marcus can’t explain it, but Seb has captivated him and he just can’t get enough of him. It’s not only the sex – which is fantastic – it’s Seb, his kindness, his complete lack of artifice, his enthusiasm for the things he’s interested in and his ability to draw Marcus out of whatever dark places his mind goes to.
Over the weeks and months that follow, Marcus and Seb continue to see each other in secret, and their relationship develops beyond ‘just sex’ into spending time together and hanging out. Seb, who is studying zoology, takes Marcus to visit the wildlife conservation project he’s passionate about, and Marcus is drawn in even more by Seb’s intensity and dedication – and just a bit jealous because Seb has clearly found his purpose in life, while Marcus remains directionless. But the connection he feels with Seb is like nothing he’s felt before; being with him is so easy and he can be more himself with him than he is with anyone. Marcus has never wanted a serious relationship – he thinks he’s a bad bet owing to traumatic events in his past – but Seb makes him think it might be worth trying. And Seb can’t quite believe his luck, that he’s actually dating the man of his dreams – who not only endures his nerdgasms about random scientific facts but seems to actually enjoy them! – and loves that he gets to see a quieter and more thoughtful side of Marcus that he doesn’t show to anyone else.
But separation is looming. Marcus and Saskia have long-standing plans to visit the US for a couple of months that summer, and neither Marcus nor Seb is greatly looking forward to being apart, even though it’s only for a few weeks. But Saskia returns home alone, explaining that Marcus was “spotted” by a talent scout for a modelling agency in LA, and that he’s going to stay on for a few weeks to see what happens. Seb is quietly heartbroken.
Seven years pass.
The story picks up at Saskia’s wedding, which will be the first time Seb and Marcus have had any contact with each other since Marcus decided not to return to New Zealand. In the intervening years, he has progressed from modelling to films and has become a bona fide movie star, and Seb has earned his PhD and is now doing postdoctural research on fairy terns, an endangered species, in Auckland.They know they’re bound to see one another, but they aren’t quite prepared for the speed with which their attraction and emotional connection come roaring back to life. It’s not long before they’re falling into bed together again, but Marcus’ life is in LA or wherever in the world he’s filming, and Seb’s is firmly in Auckland. Their lives have gone in completely different directions and even though they agree to try the long distance thing, it becomes harder and harder for both of them the longer it goes on. There’s no doubt these two love each other deeply – the author does a great job, right from the very start, of showing that they belong together – but the demands of Marcus’ career alongside the very serious demons he’s struggling to keep at bay soon begin to take a toll on his physical and mental health and on his relationship with Seb. The crunch comes when they have to figure out if there’s ever going to be a way they can both get what they want and need from each other – or if they’re going to just keep marking time and end up destroying each other in the process. Kudos to Ms. Calder for not taking an easy way out here; third-act break-ups are commonplace in romance novels, but rarely do they happen for the right reasons. That this one does makes it all the more devastating.
Reckless Hearts is angsty, passionate, and filled with raw emotion. The development of the romance between Seb and Marcus is extremely well done – they’re very different in many ways, yet they just click; their chemistry is electric and they have a deep understanding of each other – the good and the bad – on a visceral level in a way no-one else has ever had. Marcus’ issues – his feelings of inadequacy and his need to prove his worth – are heartbreaking to read, as is Seb watching him struggle while feeling powerless to help him.
I enjoyed the book a great deal, but it doesn’t quite make the grade as a DIK for a handful of reasons. The seven-year-gap with no contact whatsoever is a bit hard to credit, and the prose is sometimes a little repetitive and overwrought. And as I said at the outset, the best-friend’s-little-sibling-is-off-limits trope isn’t one I enjoy. Thankfully, it’s not the main cause of the conflict in the story, but Saskia is, for most of the book, simply awful, and I really could have done with seeing less of her. She’s the spoiled favourite child and Seb has always lived in her shadow; she’s not evil, she’s just used to being the centre of attention and getting her own way, and Seb and Marcus spend way too much time thinking about her feelings rather than their own. She does, at least, step up to support Seb at a key moment later in the story.
The characterisation of the two leads is excellent. In the hands of a less skilful author, Marcus and his issues could easily have overshadowed Seb and his ‘normal-ness’, but Seb is just as complex and well-developed as Marcus is. Marcus has lived with so much guilt and pain for so long that he’s locked his emotions down tight – until Seb starts to slowly worm his way through his walls, and finds a way to give him a sense of balance and rightness. Seb’s personal growth is expertly depicted; we see that he’s grown into himself and gained confidence to go for what he wants – enough confidence to be able to tell when he’s selling himself short, and the strength of will to do what needs to be done, no matter the cost to him personally.
Reckless Hearts is an emotional rollercoaster of a read, rife with guilt, self-worth issues and fear of failure in the lows, and full of warmth, wit and gorgeously heartfelt romance in the highs. If you’re in the market for a romance that will tug at the heartstrings and deliver a hard-won HEA, you need look no further.






I just finished Reckless Hearts last night. It put me through the wringer and I have THOUGHTS. My comments will have spoilers so if you haven’t read the book, please skip this!
First, although it is a standalone, it is the 2nd in a series and many of us have already read and loved Beautiful Hearts. I know I have been anticipating Reckless Hearts for a long time based on just the tiny intriguing glimpses we got in Beautiful Hearts (the books overlap in timeline). It was always going to be hard to meet these expectations.
What I loved about the book was the deep connection between Marcus and Seb. I truly believed that Marcus appreciated Seb for who he was and that Seb could see beneath Marcus’ outer shell to see his sweetness and vulnerabilities. I also liked that I saw both characters grow and develop themselves along the course of the relationship. I liked that in the end, Seb realized that their relationship wasn’t ever going to be healthy if it stayed as it was and that he was strong enough to break it off. Although I hated the gap of a year while Marcus went to therapy and worked on himself, it was a realistic time frame and he also acknowledged that he was still a work in progress but had healed enough to reach out to Seb again. Marcus’ Oscar speech was also quite swoony.
There were a few things I didn’t like, although some are personal preferences. In general, I don’t care for second chance romances. In this book, I didn’t find Marcus that likable in the first section and it was hard to forgive him not even sending a single text to Seb to break off their relationship. I’m also not a big fan of the sibling’s best friend trope because there is no way to make it that much different each time. Lastly, although I prefer books with sex scenes, I felt the ones in this book were a bit repetitive. Many were used to show the characters’ relationship development, which is as it should be, but there wasn’t any variety/inventiveness to them as the book went on and I felt some could have been cut out.
Now, on the issue of Saskia, I disagree that she was a one dimensional character. She was definitely the spoiled “golden child” of the family but I think we saw Saskia change after her divorce. She was more relaxed, not needing to be looking perfect all the time. She was there for Seb after he broke up with Marcus and they forged a stronger sibling relationship. She was the one Marcus turned to when he realized his addiction was out of control and she helped him. She also offered to be their surrogate and commented that she had planned to offer this all along to either one of them due to the way of New Zealand surrogacy laws (I’m not sure if this bit is in the book or the bonus epilogue). All throughout the story, Marcus wanted to tell Saskia about him and Seb. It was Seb who didn’t want to but I think that was more about his insecurities about their relationship. Especially when they were young, Seb had Marcus on a pedestal and had a hard time believing Marcus would choose him. Saskia did blow up at them when she found out but she didn’t continue to actively try to split them up after that. So, although she was unlikable at the beginning (just like Marcus was), I think her character improved over time.
Ultimately, I agree with Caz’ grade of B+. This book doesn’t have as many scenes that I will re-read (unlike Beautiful Hearts) but it is definitely a book I am still thinking about and I look forward to Colliding Hearts, the next in the series.
I enjoyed it and would agree with the B+ grade especially for the way Marcus’s issues were handled. Although Saskia was extremely annoying I had more of an issue with the parents who should have fostered and encouraged each sibling for their unique talents. Being a lawyer myself I don’t think that becoming one is particularly special. Personally I think Seb’s chosen path is more admirable. Ambitious cut throat lawyers are ten a penny and not something I would want my child to aspire to.
I haven’t finished but the repetition has had me literally toss my reader across the room a couple of times in frustration. It’s like the characters are 2 millimeters away from being TSTL and I’m p.o’d that I’ve already invested this much time, so I feel like I have to at the very least skim until 80%, see the break, and then the resolution.
I’m also a touch p.o.’d because if I’d known that there was fame involved (I only read the book blurb and it’s not mentioned there), I would absolutely NOT have picked this up. And the fame didn’t come up until I felt too invested to chuck it all!
One hundred percent agree with Carrie that Saskia is one-dimensional.
I also realized that a large percentage of JC’s books have fame involved with a sideshow of hiding—two tropes I avoid as much as I can—with the exception (that I’ve been exposed to) of the first book in this series (the fame part; it had hiding). It may just be that I have to give her up, which makes me sad. I enjoyed The Unlikely Pair (even with the fame and hiding), and I’ll probably try the upcoming one in that series, but this one will have me more trigger-happy to DNF than I would have been. :(
Finished. A B- for me. If you don’t mind the tropes I noted, I can see other readers rating it a B or B+.
The other thing that I was not a fan of was that
From about 75% to 90ish% the read had great pacing. It had me thinking that the book could have been maybe 15–20% shorter for a much more tightly controlled read with less repetition.
I completely agree that the treatment of the break was top-notch. It felt REAL and the reasons had been shown so that when it happened it was like, yeah, you should not be together, making the reunion that much sweeter. Nice work!
As I said upthread (or somewhere!) I was wavering between a B and a B+ and ended up going with the higher grade because the good stuff in the book is REALLY good. But I agree it could have been shorter – there’s a lot of repetitive prose, and I think there were probably a few too many sex scenes (which seems unusual for this author – she doesn’t write overly descriptive sex and I don’t remember reading so many in any of her other full-length novels). I didn’t mind the fame thing – it’s not a trope I actively seek out though – and I thought the long distance relationship was quite well done. (If frustrating!)
I don’t really get the whole concept of a friend’s sibling being taboo as a romantic partner. It always strikes me as a contrived conflict that exists in Romancelandia rather than real life.
It actually became a pretty big issue in our family years ago. One daughter started dating my son’s best friend, and my son was against it. I think the dynamic is partly possessiveness: “if he’s spending time with my sister he’s not doing things with me.” Which actually is sorta true. It’s easier to share a friend with another friend or group, than to see them pair up. It’s can also be a little awkward if, as was our case, both my son and daughter were living at home at first, so when the friend came to see my daughter my son felt left out. There was also the feeling (shared with me by my son) that the friend wouldn’t be a good fit for his sister. He was a good friend, but my son didn’t think he was the best boyfriend from past experience. But the main issue is what happens if the relationship goes south, especially in an acrimonious way, which was the main reason my son was against it. Unfortunately that’s exactly what happened, and it definitely caused issues. My son had moved out by then so the friend wasn’t coming over to our house, but it caused a rift between my daughter and son for awhile. My daughter felt like her brother should have solidarity with her since she felt the friend had treated her badly. The situation didn’t completely resolve for a while.
It made me more sympathetic to the situation in books, because I saw both sides of the situation firsthand. I’ll mention that my son and the friend were both about 20 and my daughter was not quite 18 at the start, so that played a big part. My son was actually trying to protect his sister as much as anything. But at the same time, I feel like a sibling can voice an opinion on the relationship without trying to control it. My son didn’t try to control the situation, he was just verbalized, mostly to me, at times about how he didn’t like it.
Same. I think if that individual is a good enough person to be a best friend, then they should be good enough to be a romantic partner for your sibling. In a romance novel readers know that character must be a good person, so it’s a moot point. In this story the bestie’s sibling isn’t the main issue, but it didn’t help the book any.
Saskia’s character made this a DNF at 30% for me, which is too bad because I could go through Marcus’s trauma because he and Seb are so well written. One of the biggest problems is that, in my opinion, Saskia isn’t well written. She’s one-dimensional and more a caricature than anything else. She takes up way too much page time and has too big an impact on the story. I don’t care for the use of a third person to drive so much of the narrative. (Not really a spoiler but maybe a bit?)
Yes. I’d probably have given this a higher grade if not for her character. I wavered between a B and B+ as it was, and decided to go with the B+ because Marcus and Seb’s story is so well written. But I really didn’t like her or the way her character is used in the story.
As with your review for GOALTENDER INTERFERENCE, I could only skim your review for RECKLESS HEARTS right now because it’s next up on my reading queue after I finish the aforementioned GOALTENDER INTERFERENCE (which should be sometime today while the football playoffs run in the background). I loved BEAUTIFUL HEARTS—I thought it was so well-done, and I’m still amazed at how smoothly Calder slid in that big twist (which I definitely did not see coming), so my expectations for RECKLESS HEARTS are pretty high—and, judging by the grade you’ve assigned it, I’m assuming she’s going to meet those expectations.
I think she will, although the extent to which that happens might depend on the extent to which you can tolerate the sister…
I also loved Beautiful Hearts! Saskia ruined this one for me, but I’ll keep trying this author because I’m hoping for another book like that.
I enjoyed her Sporting Secrets series (review of book 1 here) and a couple of her novellas – she has a new book out in April that’s billed as enemies to lovers rom-com, but I’ve left her current series alone because book one is a royal romance (not touching that with a bargepole) and the second is a cross-political divide romance and no way can I see a Tory MP as a romantic lead! Book 3 is coming later this year – another royal romance, which is a big nope for me. It’s a shame because I like her work, but I just can’t stomach those tropes.
I also liked the Sporting Secrets series, especially the first book. I’m not a Brit so don’t always catch on to inaccuracies in books set in the U.K. and I’m also not the hugest fan royal romances but I thought The Unlikely Heir was really great. The banter and the development of the romantic relationship was top notch. I also liked The Unlikely Pair (2nd in the series), although that one stretched credulity quite a bit.