It seems fitting at this time of year to imagine a book as a brimming trick-or-treat bucket, every story element a different candy with a different flavor to (hopefully) be enjoyed. Sadly, The Ex Hex is full of candies such as Interchangeable Protagonists and Episodic Storytelling, with a few nuggets of Good Chemistry and Tragically Unrealized Potential mixed in.

The Ex Hex opens with a prologue set nine years earlier. Our heroine, nineteen-year-old witch Vivi Jones, has recently learned that her summer lover (and fellow witch), Rhys Penhallow, with his Welsh accent and talented tongue, is betrothed to someone else. Vivi attempts to lay a curse on Rhys: “make him the sort of man who will forever think the clitoris is exactly one-third of an inch away from where it actually is”. She thinks it doesn’t work and goes about her life for the next nine years, until Rhys returns. His family founded Vivi’s hometown, Graves Glen, and part of his duties are “to charge the ley lines” of the place (the equivalent of jumpstarting the battery of a magical car?). While Rhys has led a charmed life, when he sets foot in Graves Glen he becomes a chaos conduit and accidentally charges the town with pure calamity.

Let’s start with the first candy, Interchangeable Protagonists: a sort of wafer biscuit/candy hybrid, with some filling between the layers that has no discernable flavor. Vivi seems to have been similarly constructed: thinly, and mostly with elements of other witches from other books and movies. She’s got the strong sisterhood of her family like the Owens sisters in Practical Magic and the repressed magical talent of Diana in the All Souls series but no other personality traits other than a love of Wales (shocker). A bit of homage to other entries in a genre can be fun, but does not a dimensional character make. Rhys is somewhat better, coming across convincingly as charming, but beyond the few factoids we learn about him (including that he has two brothers, Llewellyn and BowenBowen – no, really), there’s not much to him either.

Then there is Episodic Storytelling: tiny candy bites flavored with something artificial that’s supposed to appeal to the brain’s desire for sugar in any form. The book’s structure is more like a sitcom than a book, with short chapters that are shallow in emotional content, and usually showcase a single Potentially Amusing Event. Honestly, all that was missing were expository headers like ‘The Ghost in the Library’ and ‘Vivi Takes on the Weird Skulls’.

Then there’s the Good Chemistry candy: a combination of simple, classic flavors (think pure milk chocolate and peanut butter). Vivi and Rhys have an intensely warm, though never graphically described, sexual relationship and attraction that is a highlight of the book. Rhys is the undisputed King of Cunnilingus, though even that represents a bit of a disappointment from a storytelling perspective. How much more interesting if Vivi had successfully broken Rhys’s Clit Compass and her quest to break the curse was really her quest to save her own sex life! And even that Good Chemistry candy gets tiresome when it becomes clear that it’s all Rhys and Vivi have binding them together. A human needs more than candy to survive, and a romance novel needs more than good sex to make a love story and HEA credible.

Which leads us to the final flavor, Tragically Unrealized Potential: sweet and a little unexpected. But there are only two of them in the bucket. Sterling (who is trying adult romance after a substantial career in YA as Rachel Hawkins) displays moments of imagination in the book – one of the acts of magic Vivi can manage is divining when a student’s paper has been plagiarized, and the library’s resident ghost is a girl from the 1990s in “a flannel shirt over a T-shirt and a pair of Converse high-tops with Sharpie doodles on the toes”. Unfortunately, none of that imagination extends to the book’s structure, plot, or characters.

With protagonists as substantial as paper dolls, an unbelievable romantic relationship, and a pervasive lack of depth, The Ex Hex fails sadly in its efforts to bewitch.

Buy it at Amazon, Audible or your local independent retailer

Visit our Amazon Storefront

Charlotte Elliott

Charlotte Elliott

Part-time cowgirl, part-time city girl. Always working on converting all my friends into romance readers ("Charlotte, that was the raunchiest thing I have ever read!").
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

9 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Dabney Grinnan

My book club has, sadly, picked this. I’d not read it before and now I have to. #sadface

Lisa Fernandes

Aww, that’s disappointing! This looked charming. Great review, Charlotte, very creative.

Cathy

I loved this book. I’m sad to see it scored low on here. But then again lots of times you guys love books I hate: (Jasmine Guillory and her wooden characters and boring dialogue comes to mind) shrug. The characters and their conversations were so witty to me and I laughed out loud several times. It was the perfect October read to me.

stl-reader

Cathy, glad you chimed in. I think we’ve all come across reviews (whether on AAR or somewhere else) that we strongly disagree with. I enjoy reading others’ opinions about why they liked or didn’t like a particular book.

Last edited 4 years ago by stl-reader
Carrie G

It’s always a bit jarring to see a book you’ve really enjoyed get a poor review. It has certainly happened to me and it’s made harder if it’s a reviewer you generally agree with. What happens to me more often is reading a book I think is poorly written and then finding everyone loves it! I guess it just underscores that we all have unique, or even quirky, tastes.This is the reason I seek out multiple reviews if I’m unsure of a book, because often the things one person loves (or hates) about a book I know won’t affect me the same way. People are always saying Goodreads reviews aren’t helpful, but I’ve found that 3 star reviews are often the most enlightening because they often express both what they liked and what didn’t work instead of just gushing or dismissing.

stl-reader

Carrie, Way back when Grey was released–that’s Fifty Shades of Grey as told from Christian Grey’s POV–I actually rated it 5 stars on GR. I’m a fan of FSoG, despite its numerous flaws. But I thought Grey was better written, plus we are privy to Grey’s thoughts and motivations and can see how truly unlikable he is (compared to Anna’s more romantic perception of him).

But I wrestled with whether to give Grey 3 stars or 5 stars.

I agree with you, 3-star (and sometimes 2-star) reviews are probably the most enlightening and helpful of all the ratings. And I figured, if I rated Grey 3 stars, people would read my quite positive review–basically, a bait-and-switch, but for what I considered a worthy cause.

In the end, though, I had to go with my true feelings at the time, which was 5 stars. (So probably no one has read the review at all, if my own habit of mostly avoiding 5-star reviews is anything to go by.)

Last edited 4 years ago by stl-reader
Carrie G

That’s a very interesting dilemma! If it’s not from a reviewer I regularly follow, I admit I do skate over most 5 star reviews, especially if the start with OH! MY! GAWD! or contain lots of gifs! :-)

Caz Owens

I’m sorry to hear that happens “lots of times” :( But I always say that if we all liked the same thing, life would be very boring!

And if you ever feel inclined to write a rave review of a book we didn’t like, we’d be only too happy to receive it. Contrasting reviews are always much appreciated around here :)

Dabney Grinnan

I’m going to read it for book club. If I like it, I’ll write another review!