
The Lies That Bind
The Lies That Bind starts out on a simple path – a romantic one – that promises weeping violins and heart-tugging romance. Then at the halfway point, the author employs 9/11 to facilitate soap opera sentiments, and we’re reminded abruptly that – even almost twenty years later – employing an enormous tragedy as an excuse for soapy melodrama in your romance book is not the best of ideas. Especially when your ‘hero’ is the kind of man who… well, we’ll get there.
It is the spring of 2001, and journalist Cecily Gardner is in a Lower East Side bar drunkenly lamenting the loss of ‘the one who got away’, the long term boyfriend with whom she’s recently broken up. She’s strongly considering drunk-dialing him when a stranger tells her not to do it.
She and said stranger have a brief conversation and fall into bed without exchanging names or numbers, and in the morning she learns his name is Grant Smith, and he trades stocks and has an office in the World Trade Center. They exchange life stories, and begin a relationship that soon means much too much to Cecily, but Grant feels elusive to her, drifting in and out of contact and in and out of her life, appearing in the middle of the night like a besuited Edward Cullen, and using the serious illness of his ALS-stricken twin brother as an excuse to be out of the country. Cecily was already questioning her status as a moderately successful journalist and whether or not she belongs in New York at all, period, so his lack of availability unbalances her.
Yes, you can smell the 9/11 storyline inching up on you, can’t you, like a mugger or a big fart? Grant disappears in the middle of the chaos, and a frantic Cecily uses her journalism instincts to try to find him. Then she sees his face on a missing persons poster – with a cell phone number attached to it. This makes her realize someone else is looking for him. One phone call placed by a friend later and she realizes he’s been living a double life. As Cecily peels back the layers of Grant’s existence, she’s left with the ultimate question – can she walk away from him, even though she knows he’s been lying to her?
The Lies that Bind’s success with a reader will hinge upon two things – whether or not they’re immune to their memories of 9/11 and don’t care whether or not the event is used for romance novel fodder, and how strong a stomach they have for cheating. But even the average reader won’t enjoy the predictable tastelessness of this plot. For yes, in case you were wondering, readers – the person looking for Grant is his wife.
I’d protect the secrets of a better book, but no, this one doesn’t deserve a cloud of secrecy around it to promote its tasteless existence. Oh, the author tries to make us feel sorry for Grant – he was under so much pressure! He and his wife were headed for divorce! They had a big wedding instead of the small private one he wanted, boo hoo! Cecily would NEVER do that to Grant, whom she understands SO MUCH BETTER than his wife. Unfortunately, Grant is, at the end of the day, the kind of guy who used a national tragedy to cover up for his illegal business dealings, fake his death, and get out of a bad marriage and pretended to be his dead brother in emails to his “beloved” Cecily. Yes, really. And of course Cecily forgives him and breaks up with Matthew (the ex she got back together with on the rebound from Grant), whose main sin is being well, boring? Being unaccepting of her being in love with this other dude who committed at least three crimes punishable by law? Being unenthusiastic about a child they didn’t plan for (of course Cecily is pregnant, because – Soap).
I liked Cecily for the first half of the book. She’s understandably distraught as her search for Mr. Right keeps resulting in Mr-Sociopathic-Liar. She backslides, she tries to throw herself into the romance – but she is a journalist at heart, and a realist. She cannot make herself do it. Then she falls apart as the plot twists her into foolish knots. One leaves the story embarrassed for her very existence, and in the end she comes off as a spineless, weak fool.
Grant wasn’t appealing before he was revealed as a liar, so I’m afraid he doesn’t improve. But at least he’s rich. Yay?
The other characters fair as poorly. Scottie, Cecily’s best friend, is a caricature of a gay man who makes ho jokes about her pregnancy, and who ends up serving little purpose in the overarching plot other than to serve as a babysitter for Cecily’s kid. Amy, Grant’s wife, is generally pleasant and sympathetic until the author needs her to be cold and “unfair” to Grant in order to have the book’s ending make sense. Her parents and brothers are bland, as are her friends and colleagues at the tiny newspaper where she miraculously launches a career that takes her to the New Yorker. Yes, really.
And here comes the plot. A plot which crashes into the barricade of common sense and spins out, adding on ridiculous layer of contrivance and soapy happenstance that James E. Reilly only wished he had thought of while creating Passions. It’s not enough to have the hero fake his death, or the heroine to have a surprise pregnancy and who’s-the-daddy drama, but we need email tampering, fraud, and emotional blackmail. And if you start a story as a paean to New York and its beauty and its resilience (and even go into gruesome detail about how people died in the towers), perhaps your novel shouldn’t head into the home stretch with the author shrugging and leaving it for small-town Minnesota, where people “understand her no matter what.”
The Lies that Bind works best – if it works at all – as a soapy, messy indulgence left to dramatic readings. It’s tragically trashy, and not even in a fun way.





Aside from using the still reverberating tragedy of 9/11, the characters and their flaws are way too much for me. Would I want to have lunch or a drink with either Grant or Cecily? Most definitely not. Seems peurile and distasteful.
They’re both either genuinely bland or genuinely horrible for most of the story, so nope!
I feel like her books tend to have cheating characters that we are supposed to root for. It’s tasteless
Yeah, I’ve read up on the author via Goodreads and they seem to valorize the idea of men only cheating on their SOs with her heroines because they’re ~so special and they and the hero have ~such a deep connection.
This sounds real gross.
Personal pet peeve: What’s with all the evil or mediocre Cecilys in books lately?! As a Cecily, I’m disappointed.
Wonder if it’s a generational thing. Might have been a popular name thirty years ago or so!
Not really; it’s actually the opposite. (Cecily was never popular in the US.) It’s a name that sounds fresh and appealing; that’s why the heroine is named Cecily.
The heroine might also have been named after Cecily Strong of SNL fame, the most recently famous Cecily I can think of.
It has nothing to do with this book – which I haven’t read not do I plan to – but one of the latest books I’ve read (something by Claire Messud) also had the 9/11 as the means to justify really immature and dishonest reactions from characters. Perhaps this author read that book too?
Possibly!
Per a recent discussion, I’d rather try to understand the motives of a hitman protagonist to this trash. I can’t tell you how much I hate when lying, cheating, dishonest men are given the “get out of jail free” pass in any form- real life, romance, or otherwise.
I can forgive a single bad choice–but a pattern of lying or cheating is a turn off for me as well.
I agree. I love a good grovel or a believable reason for a bad action. Yet there is something really upsetting when a serial liar is forgiven by the “loving” woman who thinks she can reform him. I cry BS. But then again, playing the fool in my own first marriage, plus watching it happen to friends of mine, has made me a bit snappish.
I hear you. I think there are almost always viable reasons for someone to f@ck up once, maybe twice. But a pattern of abusive behavior is a hard pass for me.
Ditto!
This… sounds a lot more like contemporary literary fiction or women’s fiction than a category romance. Nothing more to say about that except, this was marketed specifically as a romance?
Also, has anyone else noticed a disproportionate number of heroines in contemporary novels- romance or otherwise- who are journalists? Don’t get me wrong. I have nothing against journalists, but I feel like I’ve been seeing that a lot lately. Or maybe that’s just me…
“Yes, you can smell the 9/11 storyline inching up on you, can’t you, like a mugger or a big fart?” Ha ha!
It’s been marketed as contemporary romance and, considering the intense focus on the romance, it would be odd to market it as women’s fiction (there’s little to no focus on her family or career, for instance).
I’ve noticed that – it’s interesting.
Ugh—no thanks! But, in the spirit of director Jean Luc Goddard, who once said, “The best way to criticize a bad film is to make a better one,” I’d like to offer an alternate book for anyone interested in a love story that effectively blends the events of 9/11 into a contemporary romance: Freya Barker’s VICTIM OF CIRCUMSTANCE. It’s set in 2019, but the paths of both the widowed heroine’s and the ex-con hero’s lives were irrevocably changed by 9/11. It covers some pretty heavy subject matter (there’s physical and emotional abuse in both main characters’ pasts and the hero has served a long prison sentence for what some might feel was a justified action), but I felt Barker used 9/11 as a valid starting point (with a long shadow) for her story and not as a hackneyed plot device.
Kathleen O’Reilly’s Sex, Straight Up has a thoughtful exploration of the grief of the hero, widowed on 9/11.
If you hadn’t recommended it, I would have. I love that book!
Robyn Carr’s Blue Skies is about people in the aviation industry in the years after 9/11. Several heroines and I remember one is a pilot.
Thank you for the recs posted here, everyone!