A New Modesty Code for Romance
Something has changed at Amazon, and it is not good.*
Over the past several weeks, many romance titles have begun returning the same message in Amazon’s SiteStripe interface: This product is excluded from the Amazon Associates Program.** Please link to a related product or category instead. The books remain available for purchase across all formats. Their retail pages load normally. What has changed is that Amazon will no longer allow affiliates to earn commissions for recommending them.
That may sound like a technical adjustment, but it is not a small one. Amazon Associates underwrites much of the online book ecosystem. A great deal of book coverage—reviews, recommendation sites, curated lists, newsletters—is sustained by affiliate income. When a book is excluded from the program, it is not banned, but it is removed from the financial structure that makes it easier for readers to find and hear about it.
The exclusions do not appear to be random although the implementation still is.*** I began tracking the pattern after noticing that titles I had linked to for years were suddenly un-linkable. I expanded my check to a decade of top picks from All About Romance, and roughly ten percent are now excluded. The correlation is striking. These are not fringe erotica titles. They are mainstream romances from major publishers. The common denominator is simply that they contain on-page sex.
Examples include Uncommon Passion by Anne Calhoun, Written on Your Skin by Meredith Duran, Hook, Line, and Sinker by Tessa Bailey, Hate to Want You by Alisha Rai, A Hunger Like No Other by Kresley Cole, Heated Rivalry by Rachel Reid, and The First Time at Firelight Falls by Julie Anne Long. These are books that have been widely reviewed, widely recommended, and affiliate-eligible for years. Older backlist titles have flipped alongside new releases, and the exclusions apply across all editions.
Amazon has not announced a policy change. I have contacted Amazon for clarification and have also reached out to several affected authors. As of now, there has been no public explanation. But the practical effect is clear: Amazon appears to be tightening the line on what it considers adult content for affiliate purposes, and books with open-door sex scenes are increasingly being swept—almost certainly by an automated classification system—into that category.
In a moment when sexual content is being policed with renewed zeal, this shift feels ominous. Amazon is not removing these books from sale, but it is making them harder to sustain in the recommendation economy. That is not censorship in the blunt sense, but it is pressure, and pressure works.
If Amazon has changed its standards, it should say so plainly. This is a company that accounts for roughly half of all print book sales in the United States and the overwhelming majority of the e-book market—by some estimates more than two-thirds, and closer to four-fifths when Kindle Unlimited is included. When Amazon–will Google be next?–decides that ordinary, consensual sex in a mainstream romance novel is too risky to support through its affiliate program, it redefines the boundaries of acceptable promotion.It’s not a stretch to worry that mechanism could be expanded to narrow other categories–political and religious beliefs, for example– just as easily. When a corporation with this reach decides which books are too dangerous to incentivize, that is censorship. We should all be paying attention.
* I first read about this here. Romance authors are beginning to speak out about this issue as well.
** Amazon Associates is Amazon’s affiliate marketing program, which allows websites and creators to earn a commission by linking to products sold on Amazon.
*** Many books that are very graphic sexually are still available. Even within series, the prohibition varies.

So, Amazon has still never commented on this BUT some are back in the affiliate program. It looks as if books by Julie Anne Long, Meredith Duran, Sherry Thomas, KJ Charles, and Eloisa James are all now NOT banned. But many others with less heat still are. This says to me that those authors or their publishers complained. It also makes me even more sure that this is done by AI and has no actual rhyme or reason.
I wanted to share a link to a very thought provoking analysis of the sex scenes in Heated Rivalry. This topic is not directly related to what Amazon seems to be doing, except for the fact that they appear to be censoring books with sexual content. I thought AAR readers would be interested in what the writer has to say about romance and the skill it takes to write about sexual encounters and sexual relationships.
Here’s an example to pique your interest:
“Specifically, I want to push back on the impulse to dismiss the skill that goes into creating effective sex scenes. It requires a particular competence to create sex scenes that are hot instead of ridiculous, and a competence on top of that to create sex scenes that tell us things about the characters and the relationship. Each of those things, individually, is hard to do, and Heated Rivalry is doing both of them very, very well.”
Enjoy:)
https://readingtheend.com/2025/12/10/anatomy-of-a-sex-scene-heated-rivalry-edition/
Thanks for sharing that. I’ve said in many a review that there is real skill in writing sex scenes that are hot but that don’t trip over the line between hot and unintentionally funny, which most often happens with cringeworthy dirty talk.
Heated Rivalry is, hands down, THE best adaptation of a romance novel I’ve ever seen. I fully expect that there will now be a slew of romance TV shows and movies that will attempt to imitate it, but will fail because the people behind them don’t understand or respect the genre. (You only have to look at the on-going discussion that repeatedly asks why women love the show and then ignores the answers.) Romance fans got the luckiest break ever when Jacob Tierney picked up Rachel Reid’s books.
Thank you for posting this!
We continue to explore the many many titles Amazon is quietly excluding from their Affiliate program. Thus far we’ve seen fairly low heat books from almost every historical romance author, many contemps and now, Harlequin Presents.
Amazon has yet to answer my further emails about this nor has there been any official announcement. I think Romancelandia should be WORRIED. This is a quiet sort of censorship that is being silently ushered in. What’s next?
Please, if you are an author, ask your publisher about this. And if you’re a blogger write Amazon and ask what the hell is going on.
And incredibly, Bonk by Mary Roach is on the list. This is a non-fiction science book about sex in history.
So, I did some poking around to see if I could find out more, and didn’t find much, but I did find one guy who apparently coaches people using affiliate links saying the problem goes beyond books (fitness accessories, gun-related items, and someone on his YouTube video commented they were running into handbags being excluded). He speculated that this may be related to behind-the-scenes API work on Amazon’s part, which would explain the weird scattershot nature of the exclusion, maybe? But y’all aren’t using the Creators API.
I don’t blame anyone for distrusting Amazon, but it sounds to me like this is still possibly a case of Line of Code X got into a pissing match with Line of Code Y, and a bunch of product tags got swept up in the fallout. If that’s the case then it should get corrected relatively soon (and Amazon will never explain or acknowledge what actually happened).
We’ll see. I think it’s pretty compelling that in books, the vast majority of tagged ones are open door romances, deal with the Holocaust, etc…. Bezos is a Trump toady–I feel like the most likely solution is trying to suck up to the conservatives in power.
Bookshop.org sells both paper and ebooks; and they have an affiliate program for people who recommend books. They sell at a slight discount from retail pricing, they donate 10% of their profits to independent bookstores (readers can designate their favorite if they want to), and they regularly have mainstream romances when my local library or independent doesn’t have what I want to read. I’m buying from absolutely anyone else before
Amazon. FWIW.
I will only say that as an affiliate, bookshop.org is for book shops, not reviewers. It’s a great thing but I found it to be very hard to make any money with. But it is NOT Amazon which is great.
Most sellers on Amazon are small businesses. Most places can’t beat amazon prices either. Sorry, but maybe you have money to throw away. Most don’t
That is true although almost all the books and ALL the Kindle books sold on Amazon are sold by Amazon. Even if you buy a Kindle book through an indie store, you are still supporting Amazon.
I don’t think the issue here is who has money to throw away–I wouldn’t make that judgement at all about those who shop elsewhere. The truth is, for books, especially ebooks, it’s hard to avoid Amazon.
Having worked for a small business who significantly expanded their online business with the addition of an Amazon store, I’m well aware of Amazon’s business practices. As a book lover and former librarian, as well as being a Kindle owner from its first generation of readers, I’m a former fan of the company.
Those very people you are concerned about (who don’t have money to throw away on books) are being denied access to them because of Amazon’s current business practices. Books “for sale” at Amazon – particularly those inside their for-profit library service Kindle Unlimited – are just flat out not available to public libraries. That is wrong. If a book is available for sale, it should be possible for libraries to include them in their collections. Amazon is preventing that.
Whoa.
17 of our current Top 100 Romances books are banned from the affiliate program by Amazon.
They are:
The Wall of Winnipeg and Me by Mariana Zapata
What I Did for A Duke by Julie Anne Long
Then Came You by Lisa Kleypas
Private Arrangements by Sherry Thomas
Not Quite A Husband by Sherry Thomas
Nobody’s Baby But Mine by Susan Elizabeth Phillips
Naked in Death by J. D. Robb
Lord of Scoundrels by Loretta Chase
A Hunger Like No Other by Kresley Cole
Him by Sarina Bowen and Elle Kennedy
Hate to Want You by Alisha Rai
A Gentleman’s Position by K. J. Charles
Flowers From the Storm by Laura Kinsale
A Duke of Her Own by Eloisa James
The Duchess Deal by Tessa Dare
Dreaming of You by Lisa Kleypas
Blue Eyed Devil by Lisa Kleypas
ugh, those are just crazy nonsensical choices, which make me thinks it’s some kind of AI bot doing the choosing (casting a wide net to see what falls in it).
Incredibly, What I Did For a Duke is on the list.
I did complain to Amazon about this policy. Here’s what they said:
Pardon me for being somewhat skeptical about their reply. I’ve been asserting for a while that if the more extreme elements of the conservative movement were ever in a position to do so, whitewashing history and labeling anything sexually positive as “pornography” would be part of their plan to stifle ideas, critical thinking, and intellectual freedom…and here we are. I tells ya, sometimes I feel like Cassandra.
I can’t like your post because I don’t want to give it a happy face :-( It’s so sad.
Also note the grammatical errors and the odd phrasing. I’m guessing a chatbot.
I feel as though everything Amazon is now run by AI.
Apparently some books that acknowledge the Holocaust are also being banned.
Here’s one. The fact that this is considered violent or offensive is horriying.
Sisters in Science: How Four Women Physicists Escaped Nazi Germany and Made Scientific History
by Olivia Campbell
This is obviously grim news. For those who love to read books in the ebook format, I would definitely recommend not putting your eggs all in one basket. I bought a Kobo a few years ago and I really like it. I still use my Kindle (some books are only available on Amazon) but it’s important to consider the future. Kobo is a Canadian company which is owned by a Japanese conglomerate. So I am not arguing it’s a pure choice. But it’s one step away from Amazon. And I think the company is safer. I also quit Kindle Unlimited. The AI slop problem will probably get worse so it’s best to bid goodbye now.
This is just my idea for individuals. It doesn’t solve the problem but it makes me feel more in control. But I just knew romance was going to be in the crosshairs! I have had a bad feeling about this ever since the book bans accelerated.
It is tough if you love digital. Amazon sells something like 85% of them. And it’s become a company that is completely unanswerable to customers.
And in case you’re not clear about where this is coming from…..
(from today’s NYT)
“Christian nationalist pastor Doug Wilson, who has argued that wives should submit to their husbands, women should be denied the vote and Christian enslavers were on “firm scriptural ground,” led a worship service at the Pentagon this week at the invitation of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.”
That’s appalling. And even more problematic given “Heated Rivalry” has just exploded in popularity. I agree about the double-standard re violence and sex, which is insane and pervasive. Why be so concerned about portrayals of consensual sex? Why is “Game of Thrones” OK, but not “Uncommon Passion”?
Have you read Uncommon Passion? It’s just chock full of female pleasure. Surely that is dangerous….
I’d laugh, except there are people who genuinely think that way.
I have read the first place you mention, and they say
Amazon has implemented a significant policy change: product-level “ASIN” data will no longer be provided for products Amazon classifies as “unsafe.”
Why sex on the page is unsafe? What’s the risk that must be avoided? What do they think happens if you read those books? I just don’t get it.
Of the seven books you mention, I’ve read and enjoyed six of them. So what’s the risk I took by reading those books? It’s utterly stupid. How can reading books be unsafe?
It might encourage you to:
Believe a good sexual experience includes the female orgasm.
Believe that men and women are equals.
Believe that love is love and that means all kinds of relationships are equally valid.
Believe that sex is a phenomenal thing.
Believe that sexual agency is key.
Honestly, the list of the ways you could be “mislead” are endless…..
This reminds me of when PayPal decided to stop processing payments for “adult” materials — but they were including erotic romance eBook publishers (and authors) in that category. So the publishers and authors were finding their funds frozen. But not all erotic romance publishers were affected (because they this was done clumsily).
But this one seems even more egregious because it’s underhanded and because Amazon is so big. And because they could do something even worse next. And because it’s harder to find a contact in big online companies and say, “Stop doing this!”
This is shocking. So it’s OK for, say, Lee Child’s Jack Reacher books which contain a lot of violence, but not what some AI bot (probably) deems a bit sexy? Is someone deciding that “obscenity” as defined under the First Amendment applies to, for example, Meredith Duran? Crazy. And worrying. Wonder what’s next. Sadly, Amazon has most of its users over a hypothetical barrel.
I think book stores will survive this. But those who promote books, especially love stories, will be even more thin on the ground without this source of financial support.
It’s worth noting that violent books, especially those with extreme violence against women, are still in the affiliate program. I’ve looked at books by Karin Slaughter, James Patterson, Bret Easton Ellis, and more are all still available.
Because of course they are… it’s like TV, flash a bit of skin and the pearl clutchers be clutchin’. Blow someone’s head off and nobody bats an eyelid.
Yep. This has always made me insane.
It’s definitely a form of censorship, as in suppressions of information, and very like banning books from school/public libraries. Both are trying to discourage consumption of certain types of books, removing them from the places (or platforms) where they are most easily accessible and widely used. You don’t have to remove something entirely to censor it.
Thanks for bringing this to light.
Thank Christine! She sent me the article I cited.
Thank you, Christine!
Not for me!! I find that I have been skipping over much content because of extremely graphic scenes that I find adds nothing to the story.
The issue is having a choice. They are manipulating the market by rewarding what they deem “good” and penalizing what they deem “bad.”
Anyone can simply not read, or skim, whatever content they don’t want, but for big companies to weigh certain content as “good” or “bad” by monetizing it (or not) is an attemot to gain control over content, which is a fomr of censorship.
I agree. I don’t like chocolate on my strawberries but I will defend anyone’s right to enjoy them. It’s very frightening when choices are taken away from us because of someone else’s very different values.