A Bride for the Prizefighter

This historical romance, set in the 1840s, is somewhat unusual in that the protagonists are working-class people rather than aristocrats or members of the landed gentry. Mina Walters has spent the past several years as a teacher at her father’s school. But now her father is dying, the school is failing, and her future is uncertain—until her father reveals the existence of a half-brother, Jeremy, whom she never knew about. (Her mother had formerly been married to Jeremy’s father, a viscount, but divorced him to marry Mina’s father.) Jeremy shows up on her doorstep shortly after her father’s death and whisks her away to an unknown destination.

With no other options, Mina accompanies Jeremy on a weeklong journey to Cornwall, where his plan for her becomes clear: He’s going to marry her off to his father’s illegitimate son, Will Nye, who owns a pub called the Merry Harlot. There’s no love lost between Nye and Jeremy, but Nye agrees to the marriage in order to get his hands on some property from Jeremy’s estate. Mina is desperate enough to consent as well, though she is dismayed by her brutish bridegroom and appalled by the disreputable nature of the pub. As Mina adjusts to her new life, however, she slowly begins to appreciate its—and Nye’s—good points.

It’s worth noting up front that there is surprisingly little prizefighting in this book, given the title (and the series is even called Victorian Prizefighters!). Nye is indeed a prizefighter, and the Merry Harlot does host the occasional fight; but all the actual fighting happens off-page, and the plot would be exactly the same without the prizefighting element. So if you’re hoping for an inside look at Victorian boxing, you’ll be disappointed. But frankly, I was too busy enjoying the rest of the book to be bothered!

I think my favorite thing about this novel is that it feels authentic to the time period. I don’t mind the occasional wallpaper historical, but my favorite historical romances are the ones that transport me to another place and time, and this book is a great example. From the clothes and furnishings to the various household chores Mina performs (cooking, cleaning, etc.), the details ring true. Granted, I’m not a historian, so it’s completely possible that I just didn’t notice the errors—but nothing jumped out as glaringly implausible, and it felt like Coldbreath had done her research.

Moreover, I really liked both protagonists in this novel. Mina is a practical woman who adapts fairly quickly to her new circumstances—almost unbelievably so, but for one early scene where she is temporarily overwhelmed with panic. She doesn’t bemoan her fate but immediately tries to make the best of it, making friends with the pub’s employees and finding ways to be useful to the business. And despite her genteel past and her half-brother’s aristocratic status, she never feels that her current situation is beneath her or that she deserves more. This may be the first historical romance I’ve ever read where the heroine “marries down” and it’s a non-issue.

As for Nye, he’s surly, inarticulate, and often jealous—but also surprisingly gentle and perceptive when it comes to Mina’s feelings and needs. Readers who pine for a good old-fashioned alpha male hero will love him. Though the book is written in third person and limited to Mina’s POV, we get plenty of insight into Nye’s state of mind from his dialogue and behavior—and it’s clear he wants Mina almost from the start. I wouldn’t necessarily describe his relationship with Mina as enemies to lovers, but there’s an antagonistic edge to many of their interactions, including in the bedroom, that definitely keeps things interesting!

One aspect of the book that might bother some people is the plot, or lack thereof. Not a lot happens till quite late in the game; most of the book is just Mina acclimating to her new life as she and Nye get to know each other. A smuggling subplot pops up near the end—not really a spoiler, because it’s the 1800s and it’s an inn in Cornwall, so of course there’s smuggling. Events related to this subplot place Mina in danger and jeopardize her relationship with Nye. But they don’t feel organic to the story; it seemed like Coldbreath shoehorned in these events just to manufacture some drama right before the happy ending. I would rather have had that drama come from the relationship itself, as Mina and Nye have plenty of differences that could have generated a realistic conflict.

I also don’t quite know what to make of Mina’s half-brother, Jeremy. He’s thoughtless and arguably cruel; his insistence that Mina and Nye must marry is both monstrous and ridiculous. He becomes a bit more sympathetic as the book goes on, as it becomes clear that he’s trapped in a terrible marriage and is trying to do right by his young son. But I don’t think that’s enough to redeem his earlier actions—though I think the book wants me to think so. Overall, his character is necessary to get Mina and Nye together, but otherwise I’m not sure he adds anything significant to the book.

Despite these criticisms, however, I ultimately liked this novel a lot! It’s well written, historically accurate (as far as I could tell), and the romance really worked for me. I can forgive a lot in a romance novel if I buy the central relationship, which I definitely did here. I’m excited to read more by Alice Coldbreath—not only are there two more books in this series, but apparently she’s also written a series of medieval historicals that I’m hoping to get my hands on soon!

reviewed by Christina Behe

Guest Reviewer

Guest Reviewer

Over the years, AAR has had many a guest reviewer. If we don't know the name of the reviewer, we've placed their reviews under this generic name.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

42 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Jane

Some mention somewhere prompted me to try Coldbreath a few months ago. The book I read was the first in her Vawdry Brothers series which are “quasi-medieval” (thanks Natalie for the descriptor). “Quasi” because they are set in an imaginary world that is very like England in the medieval era – but because it’s made up, the author doesn’t have to worry about historical accuracy.

That first book was Her Baseborn Bridegroom and I loved it so much I went on the glom every book Coldbreath has written – something like a dozen books. And I greatly enjoyed them all.

Though the humor is more subtle, I’d suggest these to fans of Julie Garwood.

nblibgirl

Onto the TBR it goes . . .

Hannah

I’ve been looking for working class HR like this. I’m a bit fed up of aristocratic characters and rich characters.

Maggie Boyd

This review is excellent and has generated an interesting discussion. Thanks so much to Christina for writing it.

KitBee

Thanks, I am the reviewer and that’s so nice to hear!

Dabney Grinnan

I am so happy we’ve reviewed this. I’ve been curious about it for a long time! Thank you!!

Natalie

I like her quasi-Medieval books, but haven’t gotten around to reading this one. I like her sense of humor.

Lynda X

Let me get this right. A woman (a commoner, right?) married and then DIVORCED an aristocrat in the 1840’s? I thought the divorce was only available thru an act of Parliament, and then, only to the man on the grounds of his wife’s unfaithfulness. Is there an historical recording of a woman divorcing an aristocrat and then marrying a commoner?

Yeah, I know. I’m being obnoxious, given the fairy tale of most historical romances, but I’d like to know.

Dabney Grinnan

I think that in ALL genres, not just HR, many authors have lost interest in verisimilitude because most readers have. I can’t speak to the accuracy of this book, but in almost every romance novel I read these days that’s been published in the past few years, accurately representing the world of the book seems low on many authors’ lists. It may be that is what readers want rather than a failure of the authors.

Last edited 9 months ago by Dabney Grinnan
Caz Owens

The one real-world thing that is still present in m/m contemporaries is homophobia, although there are a lot of them now where that isn’t an issue. I get it – real world stuff can be nasty and people want a break from it. Personally, I’m not sure that ignoring it is the way to go – but I’m probably in a minority.

Dabney Grinnan

I think many people today are so stressed out about real life that they want their fiction to be utterly escapist.

Maggie Boyd

I get that. I read the news this morning and almost had a heart attack.

Dabney Grinnan

And I’m seeing it across genres. I am reading a recent book that features a family a la the Zuckerbergs or the Gates. So many things about their lifestyle are nuts–the utter lack of security on their private island, their spotless giant mansion for which they have almost no help but don’t do themselves, really, I could go on and on. But all of those things would detract from the fairly predictable story the author is telling. In medical romances, everyone always lives these days. It’s all wish fulfillment. And, yes, I can see why readers want that!

Maggie Boyd

I would agree that it is across genres, although I would argue historical romance has taken the hardest hits. I began reading in the Roberta Gellis and Rosemary Sutcliffe days, when authors would load a story with historical detail, and watched as we reached the Amanda Quick and Julia Quinn era, where story mattered more than inundating readers with information of time and place. And I certainly understand wanting to avoid reality – it’s really, really horrible right now if you are in the U.S. (I know some places have it worse, I’m just saying where I am sitting, it sucks.)

But I will say that these books are like Oreos. They might give you a momentary respite (I ate three after reading about everything that is happening in DC right now) but a steady diet gives you diabetes. Whereas a Kearsley book, rich in history and story, is like a nice meal. You feel better AND you did something good for yourself. A part of me says the reason the news is so disheartening is because we’ve become a world of ostriches, hiding away from our reality.

Dabney Grinnan

Well, I think publishers and authors ultimately do what readers want AND what they can afford to. It’s my sense that those of us who long for the romances of the past aren’t very representative of the modern romance reader. The world is full of Oreo lovers and I don’t blame the industry for writing for them rather than for those who prefer something savory and complex.

Maggie Boyd

I don’t think there are any good and quick answers to this. I believe publishers often cater to what they think readers want, but then someone takes a risk, and we get a The Flame and the Flower, Harry Potter, or Gone Girl, and the industry goes topsy-turvy. I want more risk-taking and less catering.

Dabney Grinnan

Me too!

Caz Owens

I would argue historical romance has taken the hardest hits.

I just had to drop back in to agree 100% with this. I imagine it’s partly because the attitudes and conventions of 150 years ago are difficult to understand or unpalatable to some modern readers. But this is a danger, I think. I maintain to this day that I learned more history from reading historical fiction – Jean Plaidy especially – than I ever did at school. If that avenue is slowly being closed because people don’t like the way things were, then it’s just cherry picking and, as you’ve often said, Maggie, historical fantasy.

Last edited 9 months ago by Caz Owens
Dabney Grinnan

I dunno. I am finding inaccurate world building in every genre: thrillers, mysteries, contemporary romance, and historical romance. I think all genres have realized that readers–the majority that buys books–don’t really care about that.

Maggie Boyd

I can see both sides of this issue. The subjectivism of our society, always strong but downright explosive in this last generation, would argue that “you do you” means that if readers want books that have shifted from entertainment to escapism, that is okay.

However, I recently finished two books that were warning bells on how the Western world is losing its ability to reason and engage in critical thinking, precisely because we refuse to engage with ideas/facts that are difficult. This leaves our society susceptible to both fear-mongering and manipulation. Our loss of history in historical novels might well be a contributing factor to that, since many young women seem incapable of understanding the exceptionalism it took to break through the barriers that held us down for so long. And that some, like Doug Wilson, would love to bring back.

Edited to add: I’m not bashing these books or saying no one should read them ever. I’ve read some pretty ridiculous novels in my time simply because I wanted to read a book about Korean pop idols or alien encounters or what have you. But those books were clearly marketed as fantasy. Slap a vintagefantasy label on these novels and I’m an enthusiastic supporter. But labeling them as historical? That raises questions for me on the whole issue.

Last edited 9 months ago by Maggie Boyd
Caz Owens

True story. My eldest daughter has a bachelor’s degree in Medieval and Early Modern History and a MA in Heritage Management. When she was choosing which subjects to take for her GCSEs (kids take these at 16 here) she was obviously going to take History, so she and her dad went along to “options evening” (all the teachers set out their stalls and the students get to talk about the subjects they might want to do). Talking to the history teacher, she was a bit disappointed that the syllabus for history GCSE was all 20th century history (obviously, she would have preferred to be studying history that wasn’t quite so recent alongside the recent). When she asked the Head of History why they had chosen it, he said (and I’m paraphrasing – it was more than a dozen years ago now!) something to the effect that most students found it hard to understand things that happened too long ago. Um. That’s history, isn’t it?

I did get where he was coming from in a way, because studying medieval history, for instance, does require the student to look at things through a very different lens and mindset – but that’s what studying history is about, surely?

Okay, so actually studying history is different to reading it in a romance novel. But if the history in an HR is completely diluted, readers won’t understand that women had so little agency, for example, which then gives the impression that it was possible for a woman in 18th/19th century England to own property or get a divorce or whatever – and if they could do it then, what’s the big deal about being able to do it now?

Last edited 9 months ago by Caz Owens
Dabney Grinnan

But why do romance novels need to educate us? I did not start reading romance a decade and a half ago because I wanted to learn about how oppressed women were under coverture. Now, if a romance does teach me something, that’s a bonus. But for most, romance is escapism. I really struggle with the idea that romance novels need to teach us history OR, as is the case with many a newer book, how to be a good person.

Now, I get the fear that people are learning wrong history from inaccurate historical romance but, honestly, romance novels are not responsible for the fact that many today have no grasp on what the past looked like.

Caz Owens

That isn’t what I meant. Because those authors who know what they’re doing write with an eye to the historical, a reader can learn things while reading for enjoyment. One of the MCs in the book I’m currently reading is an Orthodox Jew – I didn’t pick up the book to learn about Orthodoxy, but the author knows their stuff and I’m learning things I didn’t know. Which I don’t think is a bad thing.

Dabney Grinnan

Sure, but if we don’t because their worldbuilding isn’t accurate, I’m not sure that matters to most readers especially not in genre fiction.

Maggie Boyd

The creators of CSI didn’t mean to educate people on forensic science but people walked away from their TV show thinking they had some understanding of a subject that in fact they did had no comprehension of. Lawyers and judges often spoke of their frustration with juries that were surprised with the actual limits of investigative science. Doctors bemoan what people believed what they had learned about medicine after watching ER or House.

The issue isn’t did I learn what the Regency was really like from a Balogh novel but do readers walk away from these new divorced from reality novels understanding that they probably know less about the era after reading it?

Dabney Grinnan

I don’t think they care. The rubric that matters to some doesn’t to others.

People like what they like and, in fiction, that, in my opinion, is the only justification one needs to read a book!

I just read a book I thought was fairly dreadful that has gotten extraordinary praise from critics. I suspect that book critics like it because it is full of criticisms about men, about the wealthy, about an older generation of parents, about our current government. I found the plot to be nonsense and the characters to be cardboard. But thousands of people are reading it and having a great time because they don’t care about what I care about–sane plotting and consistent characters. My rubric is different than most–I can’t watch most of today’s movies because they literally make me crazy but my kids love them.

I’m just saying I don’t really think this era of books is worse than any other–Rosemary Rodgers, anyone? If what’s being published is what readers love–Fourth Wing, Colleen Hoover, etc…–I’m happy for those who love it.

Last edited 9 months ago by Dabney Grinnan
Maggie Boyd

I think you and I are looking at a different rubric. Let me put it this way: I accept a lot of “fantasy” in contemporary romance. A woman successfully opening a cupcake shop when she’s never been a commercial cook before, or opening an independent bookstore in a small town, which turns into a smash success. Harvard-educated billionaire CEOs who are ecologically responsible and treat all their employees well, who marry their caterer because they need to fulfill the terms of a will or some such nonsense. I can’t even begin to count the number of books where novelists, teachers, inn owners, and health care workers solve crimes better than seasoned detectives. So I get throwing a certain amount of reality to the wind when indulging in fiction.

However, none of those books had flying cars ala Eve Dallas or hot vampires like Sookie Stackhouse or Twilight. When those elements are added, the genre is changed to either futuristic or paranormal. The fact is, Eve navigates a world that resembles ours about 70% of the time, but the flying cars and a few other techno gadgets make it futuristic. Bella and Sookie live in our reality, but the presence of vampires makes the whole thing paranormal.

So it seems strange to me that a historical novel can be divorced almost completely from the era it is set in, not by little things like technology, but by a complete change in the attitudes, mores, laws, customs, and beliefs of that time, and still be a historical novel. Call it a cosplay story or a vintagefantasy or heck. regencypunk, romancepunk, any punk that fits. I mean, steampunk wasn’t a thing till the 80s, and the term punk allegedly signifies a countercultural movement, often associated with rebellion and alternative aesthetics. It would be perfect for these books. Just like the term romantasy lets people know the novel plays by different rules than a trad fantasy, a new moniker for books that color outside the historical lines would let readers know what they are in for.

Again, I don’t think anyone is arguing against the existence of these books. Just the idea that they are historicals.

Dabney Grinnan

That makes sense.

nblibgirl

Yes, this!!! People should read and enjoy whatever floats their boat. But in this day and age where too few people read anything factual (nonfiction, biography, a daily newspaper or weekly news magazine) and the last “history” they were ever exposed to was when they were in school, the least we can expect from authors/publishers of anything with a “historical” label (fiction, mystery, romance, whatever) is that someone has made an effort to accurately portray the setting they’ve chosen to write about – or to include authors’ notes about events/characters that may or may not be accurate.

Dabney Grinnan

I don’t disagree with that–the semantics of the phrase do indeed imply that work. I suspect it’s all marketing–no one wants to create a new sub-genre called Ahistorical romance or Semi-historical romance or Not Even Vaguely Historical romance…..

Maggie Boyd

My understanding of how romantasy came about is that many fantasy authors and readers demanded works that fit that criteria be called something different. It works beautifully for people wanting the books and people wanting to avoid them.

I’ll add that it doesn’t work perfectly. For every booktoker listing genuine romance novels as their fave romance, you have some rogue trying to throw in a fantasy novel that has romance, but which isn’t quite romantic enough or light enough to suit the label.

Regarding romances that take place in the past but aren’t quite history, booktokers, readers, and reviewers would need to find a name and stick with it. I would go with nomenclature that is more positive than negative. So ahistorical implies it lacks history, as does vaguely historical, etc. Something like Pastimes romance, or vintage contemporaries. It might make a fun AskAAR for readers to come up with their own name. Obviously, we wouldn’t be able to enforce it, but it might be a good first step – and again, just for fun

Dabney Grinnan

It looks like a publisher came up with it!

I do love the idea of what we would call that genre. Herstorical romance?

Maggie Boyd

If Bloomsbury did it, good for them, although my understanding is that it existed for years before they laid claim to it. However, maybe the route to go would be finding a publisher interested in coining a new phrase for these books. I like Herstorical.

Caz Owens

You’re right. A divorce at this time would have taken an act of parliament and been incredibly expensive, and as far as I know, a woman would never have been able to divorce her husband – women had no rights at all. The best HR I read which features a divorced woman is Tracy Anne Warren’s The Bedding Proposal – in which the heroine was divorced because she couldn’t have children and, of course, she’s the one to suffer as a result of the ensuing scandal and has ended up close to penury despite being a gentlewoman.

Dabney Grinnan

For me, hands down, it is Erin Langston’s Forever Your Rogue. Based on a true case, it is phenomenal. When I talked to Erin, after it was published, and asked if she was writing anything new, she said she was taking a break because the work and research it had taken to write the story had taken almost a year.

Indira

In Forever Rogue she is widowed not divorced and the story is about her fighting to get custody of her children. An impossible thing in those times but this being an HR she succeeds. The author has the legal aspects well researched and one must give her credit for it but she dilutes the story with several predictable HR tropes and long expository passages about the legal aspects. Compelling theme but not a compelling plot.

Dabney Grinnan

OK!

nblibgirl

Sorry, I enjoyed this book *because* of the description of legal obstacles in existence at the time. LOL :-)

Dabney Grinnan

Yes, I thought they were brilliantly done.

Indira

I had the same questions myself.

Lisa Fernandes

This sounds delightful, though I’m disappointed at the low boxing quotient.

Estelle R

Thanks for this review, I’ve been curious about this author!