
Beautiful Ugly
I am so over the big twist. You know what I’m talking about, right? They’re as common in thrillers today as six packs are in contemporary romance. These end of book revelations are so improbable, so wildly unearned, that, annoyingly, they become the only thing you remember about a book. Feeney’s lastest, Beautiful Ugly, is a story that attempts to galvanize with its inconceivable shocking reveals but, instead, frustrates. It fails to provide characters worth caring about or a plot that holds together under the faintest scrutiny.
The story begins with Grady, an author haunted by the disappearance of his wife, Abby, who vanished a year ago after stopping to help a woman on the side of the road. Her car was found abandoned, and Grady has been unraveling ever since, unable to write, sleep, or move on. His agent offers him a retreat on a remote island in the cabin of a beloved (and conveniently deceased) author, in hopes the isolation will inspire him to rebuild his career.
The setup has the bones of an intriguing psychological thriller, and for a bit, I was enjoying myself. There was atmosphere and suspense until there absolutely wasn’t. Grady becomes impossible to root for, and the more I learned about Abby, the less I wanted to. By the time the island’s secrets began to emerge, my patience for the book’s hyped up melodrama came to a screeching halt.
It’s always hard when you don’t really like anyone in a novel. But when those unlikeable souls are plopped into a plot that’s a tangled mess, one which relies on absurd coincidences and baffling character decisions, well, that sucks. This story is riddled with so many loose ends and unresolved subplots that I wondered wonder why they were included at all.
And what about that twist, you ask? It’s a bummer–when it finally arrives, it is as preposterous as it is inevitable. It’s not enough for a twist to surprise—it needs to make sense within the framework of the story, to feel like a revelation instead of a stunt. Here, it felt like the author threw everything at the wall to see what would stick, sacrificing believability in the process. It’s made even worse by the author’s weak sauce final act which feels more like a desperate patch job than a clever resolution.
I think Feeney may have been trying to say something about female rage, relational betrayal, and fate but I didn’t care–I was too irked by the dumb plotting.
Would I recommend it? Only if you enjoy dismantling a book’s many flaws as you read. Otherwise, there are better ways to spend an afternoon—preferably with a book whose thrills don’t rely on a WTF twist.





I recently read this book and found his review when trying to prove that I wasnt crazy for finding this book infuriating. All the reasons you mention above I agree with, I actually liked it up to a point (although it took about 3 chapters to start) and was even tolerating the worlds most boring author (Grady), but something you didn’t mention, and maybe its a me thing but the descriptive repetition made me scan read some paragraphs. It really started to annoy me before the story went over the cliff with half the characters. It was like the novel didnt know who it was, am I a thriller, am I a crime novel, am I a social commentary or am I a horror wannabe, it was exhausting. The only highlight being that I would quite like to stay on a remote island in the Scottish Hebrides.
Wouldn’t we all!
Thank you for an honest review. The surprise ending for me was maddening in that it appeared from thin air and felt as if the author needed to end the book quickly and just plopped that new theme in and said goodbye. Other things that bothered me were her poor grammar — typical usage in our culture, but not educated. And I despised the overly graphic sex. The main characters, Grady and Abby, are unconvincingly drawn. They are inconsistent in character, emotions, speech. And finally, if Abby isn’t really Abby how the heck does anything in this plot make sense.
I’m very grateful to have a forum for stating my objections to a book others glow about.
I do not know why people raved about this book. I adore a good thriller but for all the reasons you and I have cited, the story is just weak!
Well darn. I almost feel as though I have wasted an audible token on this one. (would prefer to read over listen but can listen at work) I came across this review after getting the audio version. Hoping it gets better…. (on ch6 at the moment)
Please come back when you’ve finished and let me know what you thought! I always like a differing opinion!
Daisy Darker seems to be the moment in which the author’s writing switched from one style to the next. Fans of Daisy Darker may well like this, while I disliked Daisy but loved her Rock, Paper, Scissors. Also, His and Hers and I Know Who You Are.
I usually like twists in these stories — but I’ve come across one where the twist turned out to be annoying. Or annoyingly clunky. Write a better book maybe? But then, the author would probably get yelled at for now having a cool twist. *sigh*
I can think of some thriller and horror movies that floundered because they had to add a big twist — and it ended up being ridiculous. If the movie is good anyway, then it can survive even a wacky twist. But if it’s bland, the twist won’t help it.
Ugh. There’s a whole list of examples of this blind trend-pouncing, from writing in first person present to scenes like the Red Wedding in fantasy to Buffyesque dialogue, and it’s so frustrating. I wish more authors thought about whether they have the skill to pull something off and whether it’s appropriate for their story before doing it to follow the trend. Far too many seem to lack both self-awareness of themselves as writers and a sort of…I don’t know what to call it, understanding of the craft?
Thanks for warning us about this one, Dabney.
I really liked Daisy Darker, I wonder if this one will suit me.
This is really interesting to me. I have a few of her earlier books on my TBR but never prioritized them after seeing mixed reviews. Then I’ve seen mostly critical reviews of her more recent books, and that has made me wonder if I would even like her as an author. Have you read any of her earlier books that you would recommend?
I have not. This one was BEYOND irritating so I’m not inclined to!
I have only read Feeney’s Daisy Darker which I really enjoyed! I think the author did a good job of leaving the trail of breadcrumbs and I immediately re-read the book to see what I had missed.
But I would agree with Dabney that there’s been a huge trend (not all good) towards these thrillers, which frequently involve last minute twists, in media res narration, unlikeable characters, and unreliable narrators. Lucy Foley’s The Guest List for example.
The last three mysteries I’ve read–this one and two upcoming–have all been fatally weakened by big twists that do not hold up to scrutiny.
Thanks to both you and Kit for your replies. Thankfully there are plenty of other books I can read, so I think I’ll leave hers alone for now.