
Fourth Wing
I was late for the hype exploding all over Rebecca Yarros’ stunningly popular dragon romance, Fourth Wing. Readers either loved this book, or they hated it. It received a glowing review here on AAR, so I borrowed my daughter’s copy and settled in for the ride. And while I’m happy for those who’ve enjoyed it, I’m going to offer the flip side of the squee coin so those who didn’t absolutely adore it won’t think they’re being gaslit by the entire book world.
Because. Are. You. Kidding. Me?
I’ll keep the recap brief. After her cold-hearted mother insists on it for Stupid Reasons, Violet Sorrengail enters the uber-competitive dragon-riding quadrant of the Basgiath War College, even though she’s small and weak and suffers from a disease that makes her prone to serious injury. She could be murdered at any minute by a fellow student or incinerated by a testy dragon. Her best friend and potential love interest, Dain, is overprotective and determined to whine at her enough that she’ll quit the program just to get him to shut up already. And one of the leaders has it out for her on account of her high-ranking mother having killed his rebellion-leading father, but it’s okay because he’s really, REALLY hot.
And none of this guarantees that she’ll get to be a dragon rider because there aren’t enough of the beasts to go around, and dragons have to choose their riders.
So… this book isn’t the worst. It’s fast paced and easy to read. I found the middle section to be decent, even. I didn’t love the dragons as much as so many others, but they were fine.
But my overall sentiment centered around a common problem. Make it make sense. Because so much of Fourth Wing just doesn’t make any sense.
This country needs soldiers to fight its centuries-old war, so what do they do? They send people to a war school where it’s not only legal to kill other cadets, it’s encouraged. Why? Why would you do this? Why aren’t the students who can’t cut the program sent to fight in the under-manned infantry instead of being murdered? Because Yarros needed to raise the stakes but couldn’t figure out a legitimate way to make riding DRAGONS and fighting in a WAR inherently dangerous.
When General Sorrengail forces her fragile, sickly daughter to attend a college with a 75% kill rate to maintain some ridiculous family tradition (and BTW, Violet’s father was a scribe, not a dragon rider so…), what did she think Violet’s death would do to the family’s reputation?
Make it make sense!
Why can Violet feel everything when her dragon has sexy times, but she doesn’t feel every single other emotion he has? Why does she have to work to block out the horny stuff but not the rage or the hunger or the sadness?
Violet’s sister Mira tells her to stay away from Xaden Riorson because he wants to kill her on account of their mother having executed his father. But Xaden’s father killed Violet’s brother so she has just as much reason to want him dead, a fact Xaden points out to his compatriots when they discuss the whens of killing her. Despite Violet’s obsession with Xaden’s supposed murderous intentions, he never makes a single violent move against her that isn’t a part of her training or his own self-defense. She treats him like he hates her, but he doesn’t treat her like he hates her.
Then again, we are constantly told that everyone wants to kill Violet, yet no one ever makes a move to do anything about it for the first half of the book. Certainly not evil mustache-twirling Jack Barlowe, who announces from the get go how he hates Violet for simply existing and constantly tells her he’s going to kill her. But in their every interaction, Violet gets the jump on him with minimal effort.
Violet suffers from an unnamed disease that appears to be Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Rather than causing her serious and unique challenges, all having EDS does is make Violet super-capable of overcoming extreme pain. Then again, Violet is not only the smartest cadet, she turns out to be better at everything than anybody else, she develops the most special, rarest magical ability, and she bonds not only with the biggest, baddest dragon, but a cutie-pie second one as well. Hello, Mary Sue. TBH, what she really needed was a good dandruff shampoo because her scalp was constantly tingling, icing, and prickling.
I don’t have the word count to go into the clumsy, heavy-handed info dumping. Or the inconsistencies, such as how the dragon-riding quadrant never accepts conscripts, only volunteers, except for all of those rebellion kids who were conscripted. Which, why? Why would you send the resentful, grieving children of rebels whom you executed to be trained to ride dragons, the most powerful weapon in your arsenal? Make it make sense!
There’s the silly stuff, like Xaden’s shadow-wielding ability that works in the dark. When there’s no light to make shadows. And the head scratchers, like how no one at this DRAGON COLLEGE recognizes a baby dragon until brilliant Violet shows up. (insert head-desk emoji here). Also, it’s bo staff, not bow staff.
If you’re not a fantasy purist, you won’t mind the language straight out of the early twenty-first century. Wasn’t it Tolkien who coined the phrases “for the win,” and “well aware”? And didn’t Frodo Baggins call Samwise a badass in between dropping f-bombs right and left? There are some thirty instances of periods separating words to simulate intensity. Believe. Me. I. Counted.
While Violet has the thought process and vocabulary of a teenager (this book reads like YA, not the New Adult it claims to be), she elevates the concept of thirsty to a whole new level, most frequently when it’s completely inappropriate. Women can rejoice at the proliferation of her male objectification. Bare male torsos for the win.
And I have to knock off an entire letter grade for the stupidity that is Xaden’s nickname for Violet. Violence? For real?
We are told this story. We are told Dain and Violet are best friends, but never shown it. We are told Xaden hates Violet but we are never shown it. We are told everyone wants to kill her, but we are never shown anyone trying to actually do it until midway through the book. We are told this is a different world, but other than the dragons and the magic, we simply aren’t shown it.
In the end, this is a wallpaper fantasy. It’s like shoving a Mindy Kaling character from The Sex Lives of College Girls into an empire-line dress and calling it a Regency. Heavy on the romance and light on the fantasy, it has understandably irritated long-time fantasy lovers who expect a reasonably developed, believable fantasy world and the internal logic and consistency that goes with it. You won’t find that here, so don’t bother looking.
If romantasy is your jam, Fourth Wing will probably rock your world. And for sure, every reader should love what they love, no harm, no foul. But I think it’s fair to point out that this book has many, many problems, and maybe the hype should be dialed back a few dozen notches. If you’ve read Fourth Wing and scratched your head, wondering what it is you’ve apparently missed that has So. Many. People. Gushing, rest assured you haven’t missed anything.





Spot on. I was really hoping to like it but I’m just scratching my head and entirely frustrated by how ridiculously illogical and weak it actually is. Reminded me way too much of the worst aspects of the JK Rowling books. But at least those had a whole lot of world building and minimal hormone driven pages. I guess I didn’t realize it was just going to be a cheesy romance novel in fantasy cosplay when I bought it.
Has the reviewer actually read the book instead of skimming? How can you say no one tries to kill Violet for the first half of the book when Jack Barlow attempts that on the parapet in the beginning of the book? Then we see Xaden has to stop the traitors’ kids from exacting revenge and nevertheless Imogen still tries to slip a knife through her ribs.
Other plot questions are addressed in the book or the sequel. Now I wouldn’t say it’s perfect or terribly original and probably doesn’t deserve but as someone who’s not the biggest fan of the romantasy (ACOTAR made me roll my eyes on more than one occasion) but loved the Pern books I found it to be fun to read. At least it doesn’t have the creepy non-con that McCaffery didn’t address.
I beg your pardon? Yes, I read the book. I stand by my review.
I mean this line:
“Then again, we are constantly told that everyone wants to kill Violet, yet no one ever makes a move to do anything about it for the first half of the book”
This is factually incorrect because Jack Barlowe tries to kill her on the parapet which happens in the beginning of the book. And then there’s another incident with Imogen even though Xaden warns the other rebel kids that she’s his to take care of.
Then there’re other dubious claims like Violet being the best at everything when she can’t even stay in her seat like other riders due to her disability. She does get better at fighting but only because she’s training hard with her friends and Xaden. And while she has a very powerful ability she only starts to learn how to control it in the sequel.
I am 100% sure Jenna read the book.
Please keep your comments focused on your feelings about the book and review rather than the reviewer.
Thanks.
I didn’t mean to attack the reviewer. She’s entitled to her opinion, of course. I’m just pointing out what I think are the flaws in the reasoning.
I appreciate your comments, I find their tone completely in line with the tone of the review itself, not an attack, just a pointed question.
If your plot point about attempts at killing V. is correct, then the reviewer changed facts from the book in her review. And that is sad. I really liked the reviews main points, and still relate strongly to them. But I would have expected factual correctness, and so, I am a bit disappointed
I do not believe–and I have read the book–that our reviewer was factually incorrect. The issue here is one of degree. From Jenna’s perspective–and that of other of our readers–Violet’s talents seem outsized in a way that didn’t work for Jenna. (I have Ehlers Danlos, like the author and like, I feel it is implied, Violet.)
I very much enjoyed the book AND I felt Violet’s abilities were a bit much. Both things can be true.
Here at AAR, we’ve had many negative reviews of books some readers adored and many reviews of books we adored that others loathed. Those varying perspectives are what make the site shine–you know that our reviews are genuine, never written as part of an author’s publicity machine. Jenna’s review, just like Kayne’s–our reviewer who loved the book–are both true to their experience of the read. In literature, as in all art, YMMV.
That consoles me.
I mean, the line of humor and taste is impossible to really draw for all, so I have no problem with differences.
I would worry about books being reviewed based on incorrect descriptions of content, I am not worried about different interpretations of incidents, there again, I may feel a scene is very serious and someone else may find the mood normal or even funny. So you see the differences as interpretations of intent / seriousness.
Thanks.
I found both romantic leads in this book to be over the top. And, still, I enjoyed their story. It’s all about perception if you ask me!
Personal impression is subjective. What works for one person doesn’t always work for others, as we all know. However, when you start claiming that certain things did or did not happen and your claims can be disproven using the actual text from the book some of us may start wondering if the reviewer is familiar with the book she’s supposed to review or she was inattentive or simply wrote a rant without trying to doublecheck her claims.
I agree with this, exactly. The inaccuracies in the review are what spurred me to comment initially.
Thanks for the review, Jenna. While I loved the book, I recognized its flaws, which you’ve captured in a funny, witty review. You had me laughing out loud several times!
It is a funny review–I love those.
Thanks for the witty review, Jenna, you made me laugh several times. I’m still trying to wrap my head around vicariously experiencing your dragon’s sexy times. I am a fairly picky reader, so I appreciate a different perspective on this book, and I give you a lot of credit for bravely putting your opinion out there, knowing you would get some flak for it.
Thank you! We love it when readers give our reviewers love!
Oh thank goodness. I was so bored by this book, and everyone else seems to love it. I didn’t find any of it convincing at all. I found the heroine so annoying; she is the worst kind of Mary Sue. I’m tired of the impossibly gorgeous hero who’s the best at everything, but not better than the heroine because she’s super special. Not even the supposedly sexy parts were convincing.
The only things that worked about the books for me were the dragons. Just a book about the dragons and why they have to work with these annoying humans would be so much better.
I have read many of Rebecca Yarros’s other books and have enjoyed some and some, not so much. Fourth Wing was a miss for me and I don’t understand the hype either. I read a lot of romantic fantasy and this seemed unoriginal and over the top.
Thanks for the review Jenna – I agree with a lot of your points, but I still found it to be very readable and I didn’t mind the obvious flaws. I always consider a book a success to me if it keeps me wanting to read it to find out what happened, and that’s what happened with me. So I enjoyed it, flaws notwithstanding :-)
That me!
I’m glad you loved it. I really wanted to!!
Thank you for your review. I have always loved dual differing reviews at AAR. Not all books are for all readers.
The whole hype thing does baffle me. I’m thinking here that the very fun dragons just called to so many. And, of course, BookTok.
Great review Jenna! I too was tempted by the glowing review here at AAR but too many other things on the TBR have kept me busy reading other things. A friend who has similar reading tastes to mine read Fourth Wing, and said it was a “fun read” but not the second-coming of fantasy that many reviewers/commenters have made it out to be.
It’s beginning to sound like this work might be like the Ruby Dixon series about Ice Planet Barbarians . . . an incredibly improbable premise/world but a “fun” read just because the whole concept is so out there.
I liked Fourth Wing much better than the two IPB books I’ve read. Those books are fun but have zero believable world building which is FINE. The Yarros world is complex even though the school piece makes little sense.
I think you really hit the issue for me – it’s not that this isn’t an okay fantasy that people should avoid. It’s just that it doesn’t deserve a fraction of the hype it’s gotten. There are simply too many stupid problems and too many other good romantasy books out there. I kept seeing all these raving reviews – and the OTT Goodreads response – and thinking this must be just amazing! But then I read it and thought, am I missing something? I just wanted to do a review that reflected this – that if you didn’t OMG I LOVE LOVE LOVE THIS BOOK!!!111!!! then you aren’t crazy.
It would be interesting to hear what dragon books people have enjoyed, especially if you didn’t like this one. I’ll list some of my favorites (although I’m bound to forget some, too!)
Dragon Jousters Mercedes Lackey – starts with Joust
Temeraire Naomi Novik starts with His Majesty’s Dragon
Dragon Riders Anne McCaffrey starts with Dragonflight
The Heartstone Trilogy Katharine Elle White are romfantasy. Not the strongest on this short list but a lot of romance fans love them.
Robin Hobb’s Liveship Trader books are dragon-adjacent as are her Royal Assassin books. You have to read them to understand, but they’re worth it (except for Madship, which kinda sucked.)
I haven’t read it in years but at one time I really enjoyed Abe’s dragon-themed fantasy romance in The Smoke Thief. I wonder if it holds up?
I had forgotten those, but I loved those five books! She told a continuation of the story in her YA Sweetest Dark books. Good but not as great as the adult series. Thanks so much for reminding me of them.
I loved these!
My favorite dragon book is The Hero and The Crown by the great Robin McKinley.
I will for sure be reading that. It has languished in my TBR for a while now.
It and The Blue Sword are amazing.
I haven’t read it yet, but what about “The Priory of the Orange Tree” by Samantha Shannon? From what I have read, it does have romance in it — but it’s not the main focus.
I started it, but the writing didn’t work for me. Gorgeous cover, though.
Not every book is for every reader and clearly this one wasn’t for you. However, I find the rating to be overly harsh and the negative comments from people who have never read the book to be unnecessary. Many of the points that the reviewer claims did not make sense are specifically addressed in the book and certainly any fantasy requires some suspension of disbelief b/c the rules of that world are different. The fact is that millions of readers connected with and enjoyed this book and got many readers excited about books, reading, connecting with readers, etc. which is good for the industry and readers in general.
The grade/rating matches the content of the review. A C grade generally = “average”, so a D+ for “didn’t like it” seems fair to me. You disagree with her opinion, and that’s your perogative – but Jenna has clearly explained her reasoning in a considered, well thought-out manner. We have another review of the book that will likely resonate with you more. There’s room for differing opinions.
I understand how reviews work. I disagree that the reasoning was presented in a considered well thought out manner. There are inaccuracies in the review that skew to justify the reviewer’s position. I have visited AAR every single day for years, relying on your reviews, and have *never* posted a negative comment about anything, but I felt that this one was more bashing than critical. And many of the comments jumped on that band wagon.
I’m sorry to hear you think we’ve got bashing going on.
This thread seems to me to be OK–no one is saying “YOU’RE AN IDIOT IF YOU LIKED THIS BOOK.” (Other than, in a way I think she’s supported, the reviewer.)
I do always want AAR to be a place that no one feels trashed for their views, so thank you for sharing yours!
So, I definitely got the feeling from the reviews and majority of the comments that one is an idiot if you liked this book. And that it is not cool and disappointing to me.
I didn’t get that feeling and I really enjoyed it! I didn’t find the negative review to be too harsh, and I did agree with some of the points but I still liked the book way more than this reviewer did.
You are right. That is NOT cool.
Let me just say, I liked this book and I am not an idiot!
Dabney, for once in your life, could you please stand up for one of your reviewers when a commenter leaves a negative or harsh remark on a review instead of immediately shoving the commenter’s boot into your mouth?
Twice in my review, I stated that I’m happy for those who’ve enjoyed it and every reader should love what they love, no harm, no foul. So your claim that this review suggests that people who loved FW are idiots is patently false.
I found issues in this book that were NOT addressed to my satisfaction (such as the reasons for killing off able bodied soldiers when your armies are wanting) and that detracted from the quality of the story. I am happy to suspend disbelief for the sake of fantasy, but I’m not willing to accept something that simply makes no sense in any world. That is my requirement for a well-written book that I will enjoy.
In the end, you loved this book, and that is a valid position. I did not love this book, and that is equally valid. I do believe that unless I gushed over FW the way some five-hundred-thousand plus people have done on Goodreads, you would not have enjoyed this review. My question is, when my grade is so clearly stated at the top, why you read it in the first place knowing it would displease you or that no criticism I offer would ever change your opinion?
I read your review because I read every review on AAR, every day, for years. I am not some crazy FW fanatic who was looking for some validation. I *never* comment here and probably shouldn’t have today. I enjoyed the book and thought was an enjoyable, fun read. Some of the lines in the review such as “Because. Are. You. Kidding. Me?”, “Stupid Reasons,” “Make it make sense” were not really needed to justify the rating and it did make me as a reader who did enjoy the story feel a bit like an idiot. The line about dropping the rating a full letter grade b/c of one character’s nickname for another was also off putting. Even your comment above “something that makes no sense in any world” – why isn’t it that it just didn’t make sense to you? Of course your opinion is valid, but it read as trying to take down something that is super popular at the moment. I just think it is exciting when a book is able to reach so many people and that is something to celebrate. It’s not perfect but it is definitely not something that happens all the time.
Thank you for commenting today. AAR strives to be a place where no one gets shouted down. I hope you’ll remain a part of our community.
I don’t know why this book is working for me more than so many other YA/NA fantasies and romantasy books. Maybe that says something about how bad the last one I tried was? ;)
Worldbuilding is a huge issue with these books in general — not just with this series. (Take “The Selection” as an example.) But I can forgive vague worldbuilding if the book somehow makes me interested. (Unfortunately, “The Selection” kept me interested. )
With “Fourth Wing,” I accepted the ridiculously dangerous military school as part of the package. But I rolled my eyes.
I belong to a fantasy discussion group on Facebook. A lot of people love this series in spite of themselves. And just as many hate it. (But some of the haters act as if it’s p0rn, which is also silly.)
I guess when this sort of fantasy works for me, it’s a guilt pleasure. Except I have come to agree with those who hate the term “guilty pleasure” because we should stop making people feel bad about having fun while reading.
I loved the premise of both The Selection and Matched and liked the authors’ writing as well. I don’t think I finished either series, but the initial books were good and I can definitely see really getting into them.
I don’t think of guilty pleasures as shameful. I think of them as being like chocolate. Do I know broccoli is better for me? Yes, I do. But is chocolate delicious and awesome? Yes, yes it is. I feel guilty sometimes because I know it is bad for my health – but I will never stop loving it. Same with books like Twilight. Is it as good as spending time reading Isabella Wilkerson’s Caste? No, I will openly acknowledge everything about Caste is better. Did I enjoy Twilight? Yep.
To (mis)quote Among Friends, a new book out about publishing: Not all book have to be vitamins–some, wonderfully, can be chips!
I know people (who I respect) who love this book, but I’ve also read other reviews saying many of the same things you pointed out. I know one of my daughters (an adult who has a similar condition to EDS) was happy to have some disability rep, and she liked the dragons. She reading the second book now.
I didn’t read The Hunger Games or the other books mentioned in the comments except Ender’s Game, which was excellent but disturbing. I’m not much for reading about children in danger, so I usually skip those books, fantasy or otherwise.
I think one of the appeals of the children in danger books, especially right now, is the fact that school feels that way to a lot of kids. I know it did for my eldest son (and me back in my day). It was a minefield of bullies, unkind teachers, friendship fights, and seemingly endless homework. I often hear people try to make school out to be a fun place, and I’m like, which school? I want to go there. I think it is only that warm, wonderful place in memory – and definitely not the memories of everyone. A lot of teens/young adults suffer depression and anxiety, especially in the States, and plenty of studies link it back to schools. So I think these fantasy stories that represent school as a dangerous place resonate with lots of readers and their own experiences. I’ll add the low key anxiety we all experience about school shootings also underlies the idea that school can be a place where you go to die.
Ugh. I think there’s truth here and it saddens me.
I completely agree with you on why many people find these books appealing, and I understand. I just know I get really stressed out when a book or TV show or movie deals with kids in danger, especially violence. There are books I wish I could read, and movies I want to watch, but I know it’s not worth the emotional drain for me.
This is a conversation I’ve had with my kids and husband. they might turn to books and movies, etc., that stretch them and it acts as a catharsis, or a way to process stuff. I totally get that– it’s a way to feel seen. But that’s not how my brain and emotions work. It doesn’t help me process nor does it feel like a catharsis. The stress just adds to my anxiety and I can’t sleep. One therapist said it was one way my PTSD shows up. I keep up with current events and what’s going on in our world is enough of a horror for me. I do like depth and meaning in my entertainment, but not lots of violence or too much angst.
P.S. I’m sorry your school experience, and your son’s, were so negative. My experiences were pretty neutral, but I didn’t feel unsafe. We moved a lot (I went to three different elementary schools, two middle schools and two high schools, including moving between my junior and senior years), but I was outgoing and always made a couple of good friends to hang with. I guess I was lucky. I homeschooled all my kids, and they have their own lists of pros and cons about their experiences. :-)
I had a great college experience, and my son really blossomed there as well. So I think it’s a different strokes for different folks thing. I just hear a lot of people try to paint school as the best of your life and I’m like, nope. And I understand why you don’t like to read children in danger books, I have things I avoid too. If we can find things we do love to read, that is what matters. Why waste the precious hours we spend on our hobby reading stuff that makes us unhappy?
My conclusion from this review is that this country deserves to lose its century-old war. Maybe the new regime will execute some reforms that make any sense.
I haven’t (and won’t) read this book, but the dialogue around it deeply fascinates me because it’s eerily similar to the 50 Shades phenomenon.
Having read much better dragon books – the Pern trilogies for sure – the fact people are crapping their pants over how good this is is mind boggling to me. Thank you for this review. All true. ALL TRUE!
This is not an enemies to lovers trope, either which people try to claim it is. Xander doesn’t hate Violet and never does, just like you pointed out.
I thought of the Pern books, too, as this does sound like it has a bit of that bond between rider/dragon. My favorite was The White Dragon, with that unforgettable scene of Lord Jaxom saving the dragon from the egg. Also, The Chronicles of Pern: First Fall, and Dragonflight. But of course, all of them were good. My favorite dragon books remain the Temeraire series by Novik. I loved that less magical approach to dragons.
I also thought of the Pern books with the idea of when the dragons are mating their riders feel the emotions.
I don’t do YA much anyway, so it’s unlikely I’d have read this, alhough given all the hype I have considered it once or twice. I admit that the sceptic in me always likes a critical review of much-hyped books, because I can never take all the squee at face value!
Well, it is true that over 121K readers have given it basically a five star rating.
It’s flawed, for sure. But the dragons are AWESOME and I can totally see why so many enjoyed it. I did! I feel like this book which, IMHO, isn’t anywhere nearly as well done as books by Rowling and Collins, was just fun for many. I had fun reading it but I wouldn’t say it’s a great book.
Different strokes!
All the squeeing about book 2 had me curious and I checked out the sample on Amazon for this book. Couldn’t make it through. I just couldn’t get into the author’s writing style. I’m not into YA, so couldn’t justify slogging through just to find out what the hype was about.
Jenna: I really enjoyed this review. Maybe add “Captive Prince” to your list of head scratchers if you read m/m.
I am struggling with book two!
Hmm, isn’t sending your kid to a dangerous school the premise to just about half the YA books out there? Ender’s Game, one of my favorites, has the kids go to school where they are likely to be killed. The reason they give is to eliminate the weak. Hunger Games actually was about sending kids to a battlefield. It made no sense to me. Katniss singing a song, wearing a Mocking Jay dress, and joining the rebellion inspired people to fight, but their own kids/family being brutally murdered didn’t? Battle Royal, written before HG, makes sense of that nonsensical plot, btw. Another group that made no sense to me after book four regarding sending the kids to school was Harry Potter. Homeschooling might have been a better option by that point.
The rest does sound nightmarish so maybe I’ll leave it on the TBR for a bit longer.
Thanks for this review. Sounds cheesy as hell and not in a good or fun way
I enjoyed this more than you did but I too struggled with the premise. Unlike The Hunger Games where it makes a horrific sense that the children would be sacrificed, here, I couldn’t believe that any families would have gone for this idea.
Thank you .
I read the free sample and the nonsense you expound on above was sufficiently grating to me that I decided not to read on:
If you are a Commander (=mum) why send your sickly child to statistically near certain death ? How is this good commanding? And the trials to just get into that branch of the school building are truly to the death, not just to eliminate, so highly trained young persons are getting killed for not being good enough? Instead of redirected to other useful military branches?
I thought that maybe all this would get explained later, that this was somehow not true, just a myth to make them excel and weed out less competitive persons, but I was strongly repelled by this culture, and did not want to read on about it.
The writing was vivid and the young characters were interesting, well drawn. So I wondered if maybe, I am missing out by not giving this more of a chance.
Your review tells me that my reasons for disliking the setup remain valid over the whole book, and I can happily move on.
This book was like an ACOTAR, Hunger Games, and Divergent fan fic all rolled into one.
I thought of this as Harry Potter/Hunger Games/Game of Thrones mashup LOL
It has way better love scenes than any of those!