
Out of Nowhere
Sandra Brown is one of the few authors I read who receives a wide range of grades from me. I have given her both As and Fs and pretty much everything in between. Out of Nowhere is on the lower end of in-between – it has some of her trademark mistakes combined with some of the points that have made her a bestselling author for over three decades.
Going to the county fair was an impulse decision for single mom Elle Portman. She had spent the morning and afternoon working on her latest book and felt she owed it to her two-year-old son Charlie to give him an enjoyable evening. He has fun on the carousel but gets cranky after just a short time and is ready to go. It is difficult moving out of the crowded exit with a clunky, over-sized stroller, but they have just about made their escape when the unthinkable happens: someone shoots into the crowd, killing the man standing beside Elle. As his dead body knocks her aside, she loses her grip on Charlie’s stroller, which careens wildly into the frantic cluster of people trying to run for cover.
Going to the county fair was not a willing decision for businessman extraordinaire Calder Hudson. But if he had any hopes of getting laid that night – and he was definitely hoping to – he would have to meet his reporter girlfriend there and ooh and ahh over her interview with the hotshot country star headlining the carnival’s concert. He is walking in when the first shot is fired. He shoves the man next to him to the ground. Urges others to take cover. And when he sees a runaway pram, he tries desperately to stop it. Reaching for the handle is his final memory before waking up in the hospital after surgery. He had taken a bullet to the arm – the same bullet which wound up passing through him and killing the child in the out-of-control buggy.
During the many police interviews and counseling sessions that follow the tragedy, Elle and Calder are drawn to each other. He is fascinated by her strength as she processes her grief with grace and dignity. She is grateful that he attempted to save her child and is one of the few people she can speak candidly to about what happened to them. Both of them are outraged that the initial suspect turned out to be a scapegoat, with the real murderer having managed to escape justice. That’s something that neither of them intends to let go of. They will do anything and everything they possibly can to catch the perpetrator.
Brown is a very experienced writer of mysteries, and she does an absolutely lovely job here of keeping the reader engaged in the puzzle portion of her story. I should perhaps have guessed the perpetrator but I suspected everyone but them. The story contains plenty of (non-graphic) violence and it doesn’t delve too deeply into the macabre mind of its villain, a trait common in thrillers today, which made for a refreshing change. The prose is smooth and the characters are well-drawn; I didn’t always like them but the author perfectly matches their personality with their behaviors. Execution means a lot in writing – the taking of the initial idea and turning it into an enthralling tale, and Brown does a good job of that.
The novel is loaded with a plethora of problems, though. Brown often has difficulty distinguishing the line between alpha ass and alpha male, and in Calder, she provides us with an alpha ass. By his own admission, he is arrogant, narcissistic, and merciless in his pursuit of success and wealth. Those are his good traits. He is also overbearing, creepily possessive, callous, and selfish. He is living with Shauna, a ruthlessly ambitious reporter, at the start of the story. Naturally, Calder stops sleeping with her after the shooting (even though the whole reason he attended the fair was to sweeten her up so she’d have sex with him) because he finds himself drawn to the sweet, shy mother of a recently deceased child who naturally hasn’t had sex in years. It’s an old-fashioned pitting of the Madonna heroine against the corporate success slut.
While I easily knew I disliked Calder, I found Elle perplexing. I really wanted to empathize with her because of the trauma she experienced, but she’s a children’s book author who is pretty much done mourning her two-year-old after two months. So while I understood her thirst for justice and interest in being part of the resolution of the crime consuming her, I understood her relationship with Calder a lot less. She could have worked with the police or other professionals to seek answers but the minute he shows up, she pretty much pivots toward him. Elle being grateful for his attempt to save her son is admirable, but accepting the domineering way in which he treats her is less comprehensible.
Their romance icked me out. Especially since Elle knew Calder had moved out of the apartment he shared with Shauna on literally the same morning he had come to her house to sleep with her. Talk about being a rebound!
That isn’t the only aspect of the relationship that troubled me. Sorrow can make us lack agency and rely heavily on the people around us, and I couldn’t help feeling that part of the attraction of Elle for Calder was that she puts up only a token resistance to any demand he makes. I don’t think they stood a chance for happiness as a couple. Either she will one day wake up from her calamity-induced apathy and realize he is a controlling jerk, or she will have to willingly spend the rest of her life as a doormat, probably receiving increased demands for her efforts. Additionally, the man has a habit of running when he feels emotional. After their first sexual encounter, Calder disappears in the night because it had been “too good”. When their hunt for the killer is at an apex and he fears the police curtailing his efforts, he takes off from the home he is sharing with Elle without a word in order to chase a lead. When the issues are finally resolved and the two are hailed as heroes, he escapes the publicity by running to his parents’ house without her. At the end of the novel, Calder returns to Elle’s house and says, “I left something here that belongs to me . . You.” I thought that summed up well how he saw Elle, as a possession to pick up and put down as he pleased. That she accepted it deeply troubled me.
In terms of grading – the mystery, prose, and engagement of the novel would all receive As. I was invested in the resolution and fortunately, the writing is smooth enough to make it easy to reach the end. However, the romance and hero are F-worthy. I’d love to recommend Out of Nowhere, but think it is a book only fans willing to overlook some serious issues will be able to enjoy.





I do agree with your grading, but my impression of the characters was a bit different. Calder is definitely an a-hole (which is not uncommon for business consultants), but he does have a sort of epiphany regarding his professional future. However, the way he treats Elle and anyone else who is trying to help him isn’t sensible and makes him unlikable. I don’t think that Elle is the Madonna type of heroine at all. A few weeks after losing her child, she’s ready to move on, which I find strange. I don’t have children, but I’ve lost people. I also know people who lost their spouses. With this kind of grief, having sex with your hot new acquaintance would probably be the very last thing you’re thinking about. There was also the situation with Elle’s ex-husband and her best friend, which she exploited all of the time. So no, I didn’t find Elle likable at all. Probably these characters deserve each other. But it was still a compelling book, even with these flawed characters.
I agree that it was compelling. I gave the engagement level, as well as the mystery and prose, an A. But yes, the characters are very flawed and as a result, I didn’t like their love story.
I tried reading the excerpt, but the first chapter put me off. The hero is rich, the company he just did business with all but worships him, he pats himself on the back for being such a badass, and when he deliberately cuts in front of another driver and gets a blast on the horn, he flips the other driver off. And I’m supposed to like this guy? Plus, his girlfriend is so obviously the sexually active career woman who’ll get dumped later as any sexually active career woman deserves.
The child’s violent death is also… well, I’m at a loss for words. Suffice to say that it didn’t put me in the mood for romance at all, so I stopped reading after that.
Calder was/is a total ass. I couldn’t stand him. I think his saving the lives of the people around him at the fair and his trying to save Elle’s son were supposed to endear him to the reader but that didn’t work for me. Five minutes of basic decency against a ton of jerk just didn’t tip the balance in his favor. If you are reading for romance over mystery, this is most definitely NOT the book to pick up.
I actually scrolled back up to the sidebar to check if this book was meant to be a romance. Other than the hero being a throwback to the eighties, I didn’t get that impression at all!
I labeled it romantic suspense because the romance takes as much page space as the mystery and seemed more an impetus to the story than solving the crime. Don’t get me wrong, Calder and Elle do find the killer but that seemed to serve more as an excuse for them to get/be together than anything else.
I’ve been reading Brown since I was a teenager and man: she has not improved or changed since I was younger. Her typical alphole hero, the heroine who is an innocent angel (I am relieved that this one is not a virgin), the violent crime. This’d be interesting if she at least had Calder and Elle realize that they’re using each other as a means of getting over their trauma and grief but I fear they find true love since her kid is instaforgotten (and let me guess: they have a kid together and that “replaces” the boy?). I can’t see the relationship doing anything but short-circuiting too.
Her introing a child just to have it be bratty and die violently is also mega-unappealing.
Good news! The story doesn’t end with a baby epilogue, so Elle still has a chance to escape. Don’t know if she is smart enough to but she could. I agree that the whole Charlie storyline was mega-unappealing although the boy did not read as bratty to me. I almost mentioned it in the review but ran out of room but honestly, only an inexperienced parent takes a two-year-old to a crowded, hot country fair and thinks they will last more than an hour or so. The noise, heat, and crowds are overstimulating for most infants and they aren’t at an age to appreciate the majority of the rides/entertainment. Splashing in a kiddie pool at home after a trip to a toy store would have been a more child-oriented reward. Having her barely mourn on top of that was just distasteful. It was clear that Charlie existed only to make Elle sympathetic but the storyline was written so poorly that it failed miserably.
Brown’s Blind Tiger from a couple of years ago was excellent, as were her books Lethal and Rainwater. Those successes are what lure me back in spite of volumes like this. What shocked me about this one was that Brown’s typical heroine is a career woman, so why she decided to write the corporate success slut trope baffles me. Who even wants to read that anymore???
Oh, praise heavens! I thought they might end up having an oops baby to replace the dead one. So it’s just a romance where she ends up having a new exciting romantic life, the price being murdered kid.
I pre-sympathize with poor little Charlie but man, the description kind of makes it read like he behaves like a brat and gets shot, so I extrapolated.
NO ONE. Most contemp heroines have proven that they can do a career AND have a romantic partner! I remember liking Brown’s historicals and a few of her other contemps and romantic thrillers but man, I wonder if they’ve aged well.
I won’t read anything by Brown written prior to 2000. She had a few that were good in the 90s but the bulk of that stuff is nightmarish. I read only a little way into her backlist before realizing it was a dangerous place to be.
Charlie isn’t portrayed as a brat. He’s written as a typical and believable 2 year old who has had fun at the fair but is tired and getting fussy.
What isn’t mentioned in the review is that Elle and Charlie had been looking through lots of attractions and met up with a friend of hers. They’d been at the fair for hours when he gets fussy.
I’m sorry. I ran out of space and really wanted to cover the details of Calder being an ass and Elle being a doormat because I thought that would be important to most readers. I guess being a mom, I assumed people would know a cranky two year old isn’t being a brat, they’re just tired. Especially given where they were it made sense to me that he had had enough. I’ll try to do better with the details in the future.
You don’t have anything to apologize for. I didn’t mean to blame anyone. Your review is actually wonderful. I just meant to clarify that, for all the faults the author commited including sensationalizing the death of a toddler, she didn’t make him a brat on top of that.
No worries, this really is on me and Ms. Brown. People will read this review who haven’t read the book and I should be clear for their sake as to just what the author did and did not communicate to the reader. I think the trouble around this particular issue is that Brown tried to shorthand writing sympathetic characters by using a child to give the reader a sense of forced empathy. She wanted us to feel sorry for Elle for losing her baby and to see Calder as a hero for trying to save him. But it didn’t work because Elle rebounded after just two months and Calder was a nightmare of a human being. That was my take anyway.
Ahh there you go.
I agree with you that Brown was exploiting the death of a child. I guess I felt bad for the character and wanted to clarify. I’m sorry if it came across poorly.
This is the trouble with internet communication, I think we are tripping all over ourselves to try and be clear and somehow muddy the waters even more :-) You don’t have anything to apologize for. I think we all agree that Brown made a mess of that plotline but had trouble communicating just how she did so because she did such a thorough job of it (≧▽≦) SHE needs to apologize to us :-) – and to poor Charlie!
Nah, everyone has a different POV on what they’ve read and that is a healthy thing!
It absolutely reads like an uncomfortable and even depressing narrative choice: I’d almost rather a neighbor they were friends with have been the target for the crime so that her brief mourning period makes sense.
Just to clarify, it says they had been there just under two hours in the text when Elle feels “an exhausted child meltdown coming on”. That would be a short time to me at a fair, but I’m one of those who if I attend, I’ll be there awhile. Best just not to attend. :-) And honestly, I don’t associate exhausted child meltdown or the words cranky or fussy with bratty. Bratty is defined as “spoiled, self-centered, and badly behaved”. Crankiness is seen as different since “Crankiness can be caused by a variety of factors, including lack of sleep, stress, hunger, or physical discomfort.” Elle herself says, “Charlie was becoming cranky, I was eager to get him home” in Chapter 5 when she is explaining how she came to be at the gate when the shooting occurred. I’m not sure how this became an issue of the kid being a brat since I used “cranky” in the review, and that was the term used in the text :-) I didn’t think at all that Brown was blaming Charlie for them being at the gate when the shooting occurred nor do I think she was trying to say that he somehow had it coming. I do think she very poorly tried to use him to make Elle sympathetic and Calder a brave if failed hero, but the fact that the two got into a (very disturbing) relationship just two months later negated all that. At least it did for this reader. I should have spoken more to that in the review but there was so much I disliked I had a lot of ground to cover in just 1,200 words, lol (edited for clarity)
You can’t put everyting in a review and you did a wonderful job.
Aw, thanks so much Carrie. I really appreciate that. This was a tough one to write – there were so many problems to cover. :-)
What Carrie said!
Sandra Brown wrote RAINWATER? That’s on my keeper shelf but I didn’t recall who wrote it. What a difference between that book and this.
Though it’s a pleasant surprise that this book doesn’t end with a replacement baby. Then again, it doesn’t sound like Elle does much grieving, so maybe she didn’t need one?
Shocking isn’t it? Like two different people.
My favorite Sandra Brown RS is Envy. I think she did an amazing job with the story within a story plot, and Victor Slezak is amazing as the narrator. Her romantic arcs have never been strong, but her suspense plots used to be engaging. I enjoyed Lethal, too. I have Blind Tiger but haven’t listened to it yet.
Thank you for the great review. I read the book and had similar feelings. I really want to still love Sandra Brown’s books, but they rarely satisfy anymore. The 1st person POV parts from the killer were very uncomfortable, even though there were only a few and they were short. I could definitely have done without them, or if not, they could have been third person.
I agree about the killer POV being uncomfortable/creepy. Thank God they were short and infrequent. Brown’s books are so hit-and-miss for me and that’s what makes her hard to give up. When she is a hit -like Blind Tiger – I tend to love the novel. But then she turns around and writes this and it makes me question how it can be the same person. This thing just . . . .stank.
I used to read Sandra Brown back in the 1990s but stopped before she started to write mysteries. One of the reasons I stopped was her secondary characters were often cartoonish caricatures. Despite that, I did enjoy her books as she did produce some interesting plots. Unfortunately, it doesn’t sound like this book is enticing enough to draw me back.
IMO, she does still write a few good books, the problem is you go through a lot of lemons to get the ones that would qualify as lemonade. If I were to recommend recent Brown books they would be Blind Tiger, Rainwater, and Lethal. A lot of the others leave a lot to be desired. My problem with her is less the secondary characters than the alpha-ass heroes. Sometimes she pulls off an alpha male who is gruff with a heart of gold but half the time her “heroes” are a menace to society and men the heroine should kick (hard) to the curb. .
Oh man, sounds awful! Shades of Nora Robert’s domineering 80’s heroes except usually her heroines can go toe to toe. I wanted to read this but don’t want to read about the death of a child :/ I’m glad I passed this over though for the horrible romance alone. This sounds like one only the most die hard Sandra Brown fans would love.
You made a wise choice to pass over it :-)