Fictional Images of Fictional People
Being a Graphic Designer by trade, my feelings towards AI-generated imagery have been ambivalent, to say the least. Over the past year, I’ve evolved from adamant hatred and condemnation of the use of any and all AI-generated artwork, (convinced it involved the most heinous levels of copyright infringement and outright theft, not to mention heralding the end of all human creativity), through reluctant interest and curiosity for what it could accomplish, ending up in a grey zone where I have to admit that it is just so damn cool and wow, what you can do with AI is mind blowing!
And while I still hold a lot of concern for how AI can be used ethically, responsibly, and with respect to the living, breathing humans who create original artwork and deserve credit, not to mention earning a living by doing so, I’ve decided that instead of rending my garments and pulling my hair in despair over the inevitable take-over-by-the-machines, I would learn how to use it, because it really is a great tool. Once upon a time Photoshop was cutting edge and a cheat, after all.
So… a fun thing to do with AI? Ask it to come up with images of fictional characters!! It’s a natural fit: fictional images of fictional people. And if the powers that be here at AAR are amenable, I thought I might offer up a series of posts that take on some of the most famous fictional couples we all love to imagine.
As always, I like to state my methods up front. I’m currently using Midjourney for any AI imagery, and I do make adjustments in Photoshop as necessary to better capture what I believe the writer has conveyed. I will always indicate if an image is AI-generated and give photo/image credit where appropriate. If you share any of these images, it is expected you will also indicate that AI was involved. Let’s do this right.
First up, I thought I might take on Edward “Sparkles” Cullen and his plain-Jane lady Bella Swan (from Twilight, first title in the series). I’ve used book descriptions and author Stephenie Meyer’s own words for my prompts to create the images, and the comparisons for what AI things Ed and Bella look like next to R-Patz and K-Stew are interesting, to say the least.
Let’s start with Bella. Because she is a first-person narrator, we never get a straight on description of Bella beyond her thinking of herself as average and that she has very pale skin, so clear it’s almost translucent-looking. So we have to go with Stephenie Meyer’s own words:
In my head, Bella is very fair-skinned, with long, straight, dark brown hair and chocolate brown eyes. Her face is heart-shaped—a wide forehead with a widow’s peak, large, wide-spaced eyes, prominent cheekbones, and then a thin nose and a narrow jaw with a pointed chin. Her lips are a little out of proportion, a bit too full for her jaw line. Her eyebrows are darker than her hair and more straight than they are arched.
I think it must be noted that, based on Meyer’s description, Bella Swan looks exactly like… Stephenie Meyer.

But for the sake of my post, I’ll go forward. I gave Midjourney the following prompt:
“Create a portrait of a 17 year old girl with fair skin and long, straight, dark brown hair with a widow’s peak. The girl has large chocolate brown eyes that are widely spaced. Her face is heart-shaped with prominent cheekbones and a thin nose and a narrow jaw with a pointed chin. The girl’s lips are a bit too full for her jaw line.”
And this is what AI thinks Bella Swan looks like:

Not too bad. It hits all the descriptor points: fair-skinned heart-shaped face with a slim jawline and pointed chin, wide-set brown eyes, long, dark brown hair with a widow’s peak, and a thin nose. How does AI Bella compare with Kristen Stewart’s movie Bella?

K-Stew is missing the widow’s peak, and I don’t think her lips are too full for her jawline, nor are her eyes overly-large or widely-spaced. But I think we are in the same neighborhood.
Now let’s try Edward Cullen. Mostly, he’s described (ad infinitum) as being beautiful. The word angelic has been applied. From Bella:
Time had not made me immune to the perfection of his face, and I was sure that I would never take any aspect of him for granted. My eyes traced over his pale white features: the hard square of his jaw, the softer curve of his full lips—twisted in a smile now, the straight line of his nose, the top of his forehead—partially obscured by the tangle of rain-darkened bronze hair…”
I boiled it all down to the following prompt:
Create a portrait of a seventeen year old boy who is impossibly beautiful. The boy’s angular face is very pale and has high cheekbones, a strong jawline, a straight nose and full lips. He has messy bronze and eyes that are topaz in color.
Again, I think AI did a pretty darned good job of translating the description into a visual. I had to use Photoshop to give AI Edward marble-white skin (and remove a lot of freckles) and eyes that were a true topaz, but in the end, AI Edward is far more angelic than Robert Pattinson, I would wager.
In doing this project, I learned that Stephenie Meyer had actually envisioned Henry Cavill as the perfect actor to play Edward, but he was too old to be cast. Still, here is an interesting comparison between Robert Pattinson, AI Edward, and Henry (who I gave a quick Photoshop treatment to give him cheezy bronze hair, topaz eyes, and pasty white skin):

TBH, I like AI Edward the best.
What about sparkly AI Edward? Actually, the sparkles were added in Photoshop:

And while we’re here, what does AI think Jacob Black should look like?
Here is the depiction of Jacob from Twilight:
[Jacob] looked fourteen, maybe fifteen, and had long, glossy black hair pulled back with a rubber band at the nape of his neck. His skin was beautiful, silky and russet-colored; his eyes were dark, set deep above the high planes of his cheekbones. He still had just a hint of childish roundness left around his chin. Altogether, a very pretty face.
I boiled that down to prompt Midjourney with:
A portrait of a fifteen year old boy with russet-colored skin. The boy has long, glossy black hair pulled back with a rubber band at the nape of his neck. His eyes are dark and deep set. The boy has high cheekbones and a round childish chin. Pretty.

And here’s where things in the AI world get interesting. The first image it produced was a Jacob who seemed far too young to be romancing Bella:
I can’t honestly say if AI is depicting an actual fifteen year old boy, or if my concept of how old a fifteen year old boy should look is pretty far off. This guy looks very young. So I asked Midjourney to try again.
This time, we get someone closer to what I imagined a Twilight Jacob might look like age-wise, but I’m guessing he’s far from fifteen years old. Note that in both cases, I did not specify Native American or Indigenous heritage yet the images Midjourney came up with seem to lead in that direction. (Too, one thing I’ve discovered about AI images is that the algorithm tends to give everyone lots of freckles.)
It was hard to find an image of Twilight Jacob in which Taylor Lautner wasn’t grinning from ear to ear, but here is a comparison with the two AI Jacobs:

I’ll leave it up to you to decide which version more closely fits with what you imagined in your head or what you think Stephenie Meyer intended. I’m guessing the older Jacob is more in line with the teen love triangle trope.
This was a lot of fun. I’m working on my all time favorite romance couple, Elizabeth Bennet and Mr. Darcy, and I’ll post my results next time. Meanwhile, what do you think of what AI thinks the Twilight lovebirds should look like? And do you have any favorite couples you’d like me to take on?

Jenna, I’m really impressed that you took the time to do all this— researching the descriptions, then doing the AI and Photoshop! I don’t think the AI Bella looks like a real person at all. AI Edward and Jacob look too pretty and stylized. They remind me more of manga characters in that they are derived from what real people look like but then taken to the next level to make them extra beautiful and unreal. Thanks for the illustration!
I think it is a good thing that faces made by AI make us all a little uncomfortable (or a lot!). That is one way for us to recognize them as the fakes that they are.
I so agree. It’s the uncanny valley syndrome.
I also think it is critical at this point in AI technology for all us to be well aware of how it works, what it can do, what is useful about it for many, and what are its very real dangers. I profoundly disagree with anyone who says Oh, it’s bad, let’s not talk about it.
Agree totally – being an ostrich does us no good and might do us – or stuff we care about – harm
The AI faces make me kind of uncomfortable. I keep thinking of the Stepford Wives or the pod people in Invasion of the Body Snatchers. I suppose they’re okay if you’re playing a computer game, but they would discourage me from picking up a book. At least the cartoons aren’t pretending to be real human beings.
Agreed!
This website’s choice to champion AI nonstop while also saying it values human critics and human writers is an interesting choice, to say the least.
I’m not very impressed with these images at all – no insult to Jenn’s work since this is just AI generation at work. It’s just mashing together stock images, tweaking them slightly and then running it through a color pencil filter.
Speaking for myself – I am certainly not championing the use of AI AT ALL, let alone non-stop – I know too many authors and narrators whose livelihoods are being negatively affected by it. I assume you read all the comments on Dabney’s recent post, so you’ll know that readers are overwhelmingly unimpressed by it, too.
I’m not indemnifying the staff here, it just seems to be a strongly held editorial position here.
What? That we are interested in AI? That we’ve been writing about it? That we find it deeply unsettling?
I read it differently from you – quite critical of AI, in a thoughtful way. This is why I read and appreciate these articles, no sugarcoating of the dangers.
While I am not a fan of AI generated images, I feel like they look like mannequins, I really am interested in this article/project you have started. Thank you.
Agree about the mannequins. The images gave me a RealDoll vibe. I’d much rather look at actual, imperfect people than this sort of thing.
The cover of Sally Malcolm’s Rebel: An Outlawed story has a beautiful androgynous looking young man with pouty luscious lips and lovely long hair. When it was reviewed, many of us here liked the cover. Now looking back, I think it may have been an AI generated image.
I love this !
I think you got the younger looking image because of the line “childish chin” – the second image has a strong jaw and chin. Nothing “childish” about image 2
Maybe this is off topic:
What upsets me viscerally is the perfection of these faces. This is just an emotional reaction, my mind likes your experiment.
I already find it difficult to deal with this expectation of perfection in real persons and miss the slight ”ugliness” of actors before this actor perfection craze set in. Look at films from the 40s, 50s and 60s and you see that these actors would not be cast today. I regret that. I do not feel emotionally connected to people who are excessively young and excessively beautiful and excessively put together every single time. It disconnects me and creates distance – films are less interesting to me than they were before.
Now, the AI versions that you are offering us feel even worse than that. These people look, on the one hand, fascinating and on the other hand scary even in the details of how they look, their utter evenness of face, their huge eyes, sculpted everything for men, and porcelain doll look of the woman feels awful for me – unreal. This actually may fit the Twilight universe, but it puts me off.
I do not want Michelangelo’s David, or Venus of Milo, in a romance because I cannot relate. Unless dealing with beauty is one of the main topics and is handled in a careful way. I am very wary of unearthly beauty, both in people I meet and in romance.
Touché, Lieselotte!! You’ve summed up my feelings. My comment on AI authorship included anodyne and these faces are the same and also very anodyne. But like passing at a bad road accident, you can’t help yourself and look and gawp. I confess looking forward to seeing how Jenna’s Lizzie and Mr Darcy appear when there have been so many TV and film versions and most of us have our favourites.
I almost mentioned it in my write up – probably will in the next round – but it is true that the AI algorithm makes everyone exceptionally beautiful. You can change this to a degree by telling the AI how much “stylization” you want it to employ. There is a trade off – the less stylization you want, the more closely the result will get to what you asked for, whereas the higher the stylization, the more “beautiful” the resulting image will be. It is especially the case when you ask for depiction of woman that they are stereotypically “beautiful” with full, cupid bow lips, unrealistically large and widely spaced eyes, big breasts, etc. I’ve read that the makers of AI are working to combat the tendency for AI to lean in stereotypical ways.
All that said (and while I do agree with your sentiment), I personally don’t find the image of Bella that AI produced to be beautiful at all. Specifically as it applies to Twilight, Meyer’s continual insistence in making Bella and all of the Cullins pasty white really turned me off, and seeing it depicted graphically just cemented my original thoughts. As far as Edward goes, I think Bella’s constantly remarking on how unearthly beautiful he is means that AI’s depiction is actually quite accurate in making him in-humanly beautiful.
The first time I saw Robert Pattinson was in a Harry Potter movie, and I found him stunningly beautiful, almost unreal. In that sense he fits the description of Edward Cullen, at least for me. I find it hard to relate to such perfection, which I think fits with Liselotte’s point about AI-generated faces. The difference is that Pattinson is an actual person, but he inspired the same response. Sometimes people who are so eerily beautiful actually become more attractive over time — their faces become somehow more relatable as they age a bit and become slightly less perfect.
Yes!
I remember seeing Robert Redford in a film where he looked not young. Suddenly, I found him relatable – before, just bland blonde blue eyed perfection …
I love this because it so much proves the adage “different strokes for different folks”. I personally don’t find Robert Pattinson to be that beautiful at all. He’s handsome, to be sure. But there are aspects of his face that, to me, look odd. His mouth, especially. But that’s my perspective, of course. As far as people who grow more attractive over time…George Clooney is my poster boy for that. :)
Totally understand. It’s also interesting to me that someone may not be objectively handsome (if there is such a thing since our opinions about what is/is not handsome are so subjective) yet may be wildly attractive. Some of the actors I’ve found compelling have what I think of as changeable faces. I had a huge crush on Sean Bean in the Sharpe series, and I find Benedict Cumberbatch commands the screen as Sherlock, but I don’t think they are classically handsome (unlike James Norton, but that’s another story), and they certainly aren’t beautiful.
Bella looks to me like a version of the medieval Madonnas, or the Japanese formal make up – she is a version of doll like perfection, even if she is not my version. But then, I am just not into women, so their beauty is theoretical to me even more so than men’s – and I am also not into beauty, but into aliveness, into what shines through.