The Original Unforgettable

You never forget your first.

Your first romance novel, that is. And I remember mine vividly. I had never so much as looked inside a romance novel before that day, and my family wanted me to read books which would improve my mind, like encyclopedias. If I settled for fiction instead, then it had to be respectable fiction like the classics, or at worst the works of Tolkien and Asimov, dignified hardcovers with solemn cover art.

I enjoyed science fiction and fantasy, so I didn’t try a romance novel until I was sixteen. Growing up in a Muslim country and attending a Catholic school meant a pretty sheltered existence, so I’m not sure why I went for this one. Maybe because I was at a thrift store and could afford it, but more likely because I had hormones coming out of my ears and no way to deal with them. Plus, the cover was the epitome of ‘80s clinch art, and not shy about what was inside the book.

It was a historical romance, though you couldn’t have guessed that from the woman wearing a miniskirt, a blouse knotted above her midriff, and purple eyeshadow. The man embracing her was shirtless, which was to me what an exposed ankle would have been to a Victorian schoolboy. And finally there was the shininess of the cover, from the holographic sticker on the upper right corner to the raised lettering of the title in a metallic magenta.

I had no idea books this flashy even existed. My world had just turned into a Skittles ad. I was tasting the rainbow.

Since you’re probably wondering about the title of this life-altering experience, it was The Pirate’s Lady, by Kay McMahon. The book is out of print, which is for the best, since it’s got everything from the rapist hero to the Madonna-whore complex to the character with a disability who’s there to show what a great boss the hero is. But I will say this for the author, she fully commits to the realism of piracy, since we’re told that the hero had once kidnapped a young woman who stabbed him when he was trying to rape her, so he turned her over to his crew, who murdered her and then gave him one of her earrings as a souvenir. He now wears it, like a serial killer keeping trophies. The sex scenes were beyond purple, and I still remember the line “they explored the celestial spheres as one”, which might be simultaneous orgasm or space travel (or possibly sex in space).

Even back then, I could tell this was horrific. Fascinating, because sex scenes were foreign to my reading experience, but still horrific. But what really intrigued me were the last few pages of the book, which listed dozens more like it, all with breathlessly unrestrained titles like Forbidden Passion and Ruthless Ecstasy. These were books you could never allow the nuns to catch you reading. So of course I wanted more.

I gave my first romance novel back to the thrift store. But I never forgot it, and it was my gateway drug into the genre. The next romance I picked up was Sweet Savage Love, which was even more incendiary as far as sex scenes went. A few years later I discovered AAR, where I read all the F and D reviews because they were so entertaining, then wondered if the A reviews would be just as good, then realized after reading those that the genre had come a long way since the ‘80s. And the rest, as they say, is history, or at least historical romance.

How about you? What was your first romance, and did it make you want to read more?   

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

54 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Manangbok

I started reading romance novels 30 years ago as a teenager and the first book I read was Iris Johansen’s The Wind Dancer Trilogy. I bought them because they were on sale and I was fascinated at the book cover. There was a time when romance novels would have a lip book cover where the outer one is mostly artsy, but when you flip it there would be a clinch on the inner cover. Anyway, I loves these historical romances by Iris Johansen and they were what started me on reading fiction and romance. Too bad she mostly writes thrillers and crime novels now.

Marian Perera

I miss those covers! Another thing that got me hooked on romance was the Cover Cafe’s annual contest, which is sadly not a thing any more. The covers were so beautiful and artistic and imaginative. The cartoony approach these days just doesn’t evoke the same interest for me.

Annelie

I know. I’m very late to the discussion, but I live and lived in Germany so it’s not as simple to remember the very first romance as I read them in German.
Heyer, that for sure, wrote my first historicals. In the sixties her works were printed in a paperback edition I could afford as a student.
But a few days ago I suddenly could remember my first (contemporary) romance: A Song Begins by Mary Burchell, the first of her Warrender series. The German edition was published in a catholic periodical read by my mother. I never read the novels published there until one day I noticed a very different novel. So that’s my very first romance whose German title I don’t remember. I think it must have been in the late sixties.

Dabney Grinnan

Caz loves that book, if I remember correctly.

Caz Owens

Yes – the Warrender series (I haven’t finished reading them all yet) is a favourite because it’s set in the world of classical music. They were written in the 60s but the background doesn’t feel that much different to the industry I worked in in the 90s. The author and her sister helped a number of Jews escape from Germany during WWII.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Burchell

Last edited 1 year ago by Caz Owens
Annelie

About the heroisme of Mary Burchell and her sister I’ve read a few years ago. I was very impressed as they did the rescue with a lot of risk for themselves.
Meanwhile I’ve read many of her books in English.

tster

My mom picked them up for a quarter at our community center, so my first was a pilfered one of hers, maybe around 13 or 14? Most had rape-adjacent sex, if not outright rape. There were a few others that I remember from the same age — some romance novel with the word “Shawnee” or “Pawnee” in the title that fetishized the Native American hero, and then one with a name I don’t remember at all where the heroine masquerades as a bar boy by day and then somehow sleeps with the hero by night. But of course they’re best bros when she’s in her boy costume. As the song goes, “It was acceptable in the 80s…I guess?”

The other thing that made the rounds in my early teens were VC Andrews novels. I read them, but I was so traumatized by the sibling rape that I blocked it out. I talked with a friend years later and she was like “you realize her brother raped her, right?” and I was like “oh, really???” Those probably don’t count as romance though, as none really have a true HEA.

tster

I think before this, I was really drawn to romance as a plot line in books that weren’t straight romance. Pride and Prejudice, Jane Eyre, Wuthering Heights, etc. Then MM Kaye was (and remains) an absolute favorite. Anne of Green Gables (I reread Anne of the Island a million times), and then the secondary romance plots in Lois Duncan books.

Marian Perera

The rape in Flowers in the Attic is definitely rape, but I can see why readers might not feel this way, because Cathy thinks that if Chris wanted it so much, then she wanted what he wanted. Something like that, anyway (it’s been a while since I read the book and I’m holding out for a particular copy for my collection). I wouldn’t class these as romances, though. Southern Gothic, maybe?

Elaine S

Little Women (read when I was 9 or 10) – sort of qualifies I suppose as it has elements of romance and/or Mrs Mike by Benedict and Nancy Freedman (Mounties!!!). I then started on Phyllis A Whitney and Victoria Holt and those two really got me started on reading romance. I never read Barbara Cartland as a young reader – nor as an older one. In the meanwhile my other was hiding Peyton Place and her Harold Robbins books from me.

Manjari

I grew up in Southern California in the 1970s. We couldn’t afford to buy books but my mother willingly drove me to the local library every 2 weeks. She would sit at a table while I wandered around picking my books and bless her, she never restricted my choices. Back then, there was no such thing as YA. It was just Children’s Literature then adult. When I got to my preteen years, I loved books with a romance element. They weren’t true romances as the main storyline was about the protagonist’s personal growth and development rather than their romantic relationship. Some examples were Constance by Patricia Clapp, The Witch of Blackbird Pond by Elizabeth George Speare, Rose in Bloom by Louisa May Alcott, Little Town on the Prairie and These Happy Golden Years by Laura Ingalls Wilder, and the Anne of Green Gables series by L.M. Montgomery.

I probably read my first adult romances around age 13-14 years and they were category romances from those revolving racks of paperbacks at the library. I don’t know what book I read first but the category lines I liked best were Harlequin Presents and Signet Regency Romances. I liked HP because of the exotic locations, alpha men, and higher angst and spice levels. HP authors I liked included Charlotte Lamb, Sally Wentworth and Anne MacAllister. For Signet Regency, I loved Edith Layton. By the mid-late 1980s I started reading more full length standalone novels and from then through the early 1990s, I read a lot by the 4 J’s – Johanna Lindsey, Julie Garwood, Judith McNaught and Jude Devereaux. They were some of the most popular romance novelists of that time. I also recall liking Elizabeth Lowell, especially her medieval series starting with Untamed. Ah, good memories!

Cathy

Same!! Thanks for bringing me down memory land :) I can’t believe I forgot about Elizabeth Lowell! Who are you reading nowadays?

Manjari

Hi Cathy! I read mostly contemporary nowadays and for the past 4 years, a lot of M/M romance. Historical M/F authors that I enjoy include Julie Anne Long, Lisa Kleypas, Sarah MacLean, Julia Quinn and Mimi Matthews. Some of the contemporary M/F authors I like are Penny Reid, Sarina Bowen, Elsie Silver, Kristen Callihan, and Claire Kingsley. And for contemporary M/M, I like Lily Morton, Nicky James, Jax Calder, Zarah Detand, Briar Prescott, and so many others (I could go on and on!).

Cathy

Thank you! Always looking for new authors and we seemed similar in reading tastes :)

Lynda X

I would love to read other columns you have written here. How do I find them?

Kayne Spooner

Oh my gosh, those are so funny!

Lynda X

You will not believe this, but I remember both columns from when you first posted them!

Pure perfection–and so true, even today!

Lynda X

You will not believe it, but it’s true. I remember both columns from when you first wrote them. I howled. And howled. And then, some more.

It was a pleasure, rereading them. So many of them hold true today.

Most hhistoricals are just reflections of today’s ideals and values, with a VERY quick tip of the hat to our romanticized versions of the past. I suspect that if we time traveled to any time in the past, we would be appalled, if not suicidal.

I hope you write for AAR again.

Marian Perera

Thanks so much, Lynda! And I think that I’d find it very difficult to cope with differing values if I went back in time to my childhood years, let alone to the eighteen hundreds, which is when I usually set my historical romances.

It may be a matter of finding the happy medium between reflecting modern values to a ridiculous extent and being so true to the reality of that time that readers are turned off. Actually, this might be a good topic for another post – what are our lines in the sand when it comes to historical accuracy?

Angela

I didn’t think of it as a romance novel at the time, but in retrospect, the first romance I fell in love with was The Blue Castle by L.M. Montgomery.

But my way in as a kid was mainly through female-centered historical fiction, a lot of it for children and teens. I loved Ann Rinaldi but started to outgrow her a bit, so my school librarian, who knew my tastes pretty well, recommended Anya Seton and Madeleine Brent. I just sought out more read-alikes from there.

DiscoDollyDeb

Noelle Adams has written two contemporary retellings of THE BLUE CASTLE: LISTED and COUNTED. I haven’t read LISTED, but I have read COUNTED (where the hero, not the heroine, has a terminal condition) and it’s very good—angsty, melancholy, and ultimately very sweet. Highly recommended.

Angela

Thank you for telling me. I just read a sample of Counted, and I like her writing!

Manjari

Counted started off as a serial for her newsletter subscribers. I really liked it too! (Haven’t read Listed either)

ayesha

whitney my love or was it a kingdom of dreams? i started very young, buying these two books secondhand for a measly few hundreds of rupees. i remember summer holidays, loadshedding and endless humidity and me reading books on books, first judith macnaught, then amanda quick, lisa kleypas, nora roberts. i never worked uo the courage to buy mills and boon, but the love of romance has persisted, following me to medical school and hopefully residency.

Jessica

I read a lot of YA fiction/romance…Constance (sigh…loved that book), Sunfire romances, Sweet Valley High, etc. But the first “adult” romance I read was Carolyn Bourne’s Texas Conquest (clinch cover and all). I was young enough and naive enough to think all of Kensington’s romances would be good because I enjoyed that one, but figured that one out pretty quickly.

From there it was all downhill *grin*. A lot of historical romance, then branching out to contemporary. I didn’t do much paranormal until I started reading m/m in early to mid 2010s.

Manjari

Constance was one of my favorites too and really holds up – I gave it to my daughter to read when she was old enough and she loved it too (I read it in the 1980s and my daughter in the 2010s).

Jessica

I’m tempted to buy a copy, just so I have it.

Lisa Fernandes

Irresistible Impulse by Billie Douglas – AKA Barbara Delinksy! Two people get stuck on sequestered jury duty together (on a crime of passion case!) and fall for each other but have problems making it work post-trial.

Lynda X

Oh, I just should NOT read this site when I’m drinking Coke. Coke and laughter don’t mix.

Heelarious column!

Like millions of (mostly) women, my first real romance (“Gone with the Wind” and “Jane Eyre,” aside) was “The Flame and the Flower” with poor, sweet, clueless Heather, roaming the London streets by the docks at night, who is picked up by the first mate (probably called Snee) for his captain (who should be called Captain Hook, but is not) who then, mistaking her for a prostitutes, rapes her. It’s basically Cinderella, if you discount the sea voyage (something ALWAYS interferes with their having sex), slave-owning Brandon and his warmish relationship with a vicious, disappointed blonde neighbor.

Two weeks later, I read Rosemary Roger’s “Sweet, Savage Love.”

Ten years later, I still wondered, “Why, oh why do the heroes have to be despicable? And why can’t we ever see his thoughts when he is falling in love (when not engaged in rape)? Why? oh, why?”

Because it was against the publishers’ rules. (Yes, I am serious. There were rules.)

“The Flame and the Flower” was the beginning of pleasurable reading that (so far) has lasted decades.

I’ll always have a place in my heart for Heather and Brandon, as long as I don’t try to reread the book.

seantheaussie

The Duchess War by Courtney Milan, “The weather is lovely. The streets are paved with cobblestones. Your tits are magnificent.”

Indiragovindan

My first and first twenty romance novels were by Georgette Heyer. I was sixteen and in my first year of college. My college principal was an English professor and had filled the library to the brim with entire collection of every British author in every genre. (India was very UK orientd then.) So there was not only all of Charles Dickens and his ilk, but also all of Georgette Heyer, Agatha Christie and Conan Doyle. I was a history major and studying British history that year. At sixteen, I was not allowed to read fiction let alone romance fiction. Heck, I was not allowed to talk to boys or even look at them. So, I read Heyer in secret at the library in between classes. Since I was a history major, reading historical romance was a perfectly acceptable way to expand my knowledge, I thought! Heyer’s romances were so chaste, I felt safe reading them, even if secretly.

After Heyer, wanting more I graduated to Mills&Boon. There was a lending library right across my college and I borrowed m&b by the dozen using my unused bus fare. At 25, I switched to reading Hesse and Kafka and was too embarrassed to read romances and did not read them for the next 35 years.

For nostalgic reasons, during the pandemic, I re-read all of Heyer’s novels. At the same time, I discovered a fantasy blog site where, to my great surprise, all of Heyer’s romances were critically examined. From there, I found this site and was totally blown away to discover that romance was now a multi-billion dollar genre and that Americans have taken over it completely! And the sex!!! This little sixteen year old never would have dared to read a Lisa Kleypas or Loretta Chase then.

WendyW

I do not remember my first romance. :( I started reading them at my best friend’s house because her mother had some lying around. The first one whose name I can remember was The Black Lyon (Jude Deveraux), but I feel pretty sure I read some Kathleen Woodiwiss before then.

Lil

I guess I’m a late bloomer in terms of romance. I read Mary Stewart when her books were new, but most of my light reading was mystery stories. Then, after I retired I was looking for something cheerful to read and a friend suggested romance. So i went to the library and picked up Loretta Chase’s MR. IMPOSSIBLE, and I was hooked. I hadn’t had as much fun since I was a kid reading Nancy Drew.

Dabney Grinnan

Mr. Impossible is a very good time. I love all of those in that Chase era.

DiscoDollyDeb

There were always romance or romance-adjacent books as I was growing up (1960s into the 1970s). I was an avid reader and consumed mass quantities of books of wide-ranging quality. I read lots of gothics (Victoria Holt being the Queen of the genre) and historical romances (with Jean Plaidy—one of Holt’s pen names—being the Queen of the genre), but it wasn’t until 1976 and Rosemary Rogers’s SWEET SAVAGE LOVE that I began my romance-reading journey proper. I haven’t looked at SSL in decades, but I daresay it hasn’t help up well.

Caz Owens

Plaidy wrote historical fiction rather than historical romance, though. She did write a few HRs, but most of her books were about the kings & queens of England, from William the Conquerer through to Queen Victoria. I still have most of them in paperback!

DiscoDollyDeb

Yes—that was a slip on my part. I meant historical fiction. I read everything Plaidy wrote, but Margaret Campbell Barnes and Norah Lofts were also popular historical fiction writers (a lot of their books from mid-century and earlier were republished in the 1970s during the historical fiction boom caused by “The Six Wives of Henry VIII” and “Elizabeth R” on PBS). My favorite historical fiction is still Anya Seton’s KATHERINE about John of Gaunt’s long-time mistress (later wife), Katherine Swineford (she was also Geoffrey Chaucer’s sister-in-law). Its steeped in the medieval world, and—unlike so many of our early favorites—it is still a remarkable, engaging read.

Caz Owens

I read Barnes and Lofts, as well, but they never quite hit the spot the way Plaidy did. I loved Katherine, and a few years back I reviewed the audiobook version of The Winthrop Woman, which was excellent:

a richly detailed piece of biographical fiction based on the life of Elizabeth Fones Winthrop Feake Hallett, niece of John Winthrop, one of the founders of the Massachusetts Bay Colony, and its first Governor.

Well worth a look/listen IMO.

Last edited 1 year ago by Caz Owens
Dabney Grinnan

Yeah–it did not hold up for me except, damn, they had chemistry.

Caz Owens

I’m pretty sure my first actual romance was a Betty Neels Mills & Boon when I was 13 or 14 – although I’m buggered if I can remember the title! I mostly read historical fiction (I got hooked on Jean Plaidy when I was 11, thanks to a rec. from my then English teacher – the list included Mary Stewart, Norah Lofts, Anya Seton, Phyllis A. Whitney and others as well), and classics, but I did slowly make my way through a lot of Georgette Heyer and Victoria Holt by my early 20s. Then, in the mid 80s came Stella Riley (The Marigold Chain & A Splendid Defiance, both still favourites). I didn’t start reading romance almost exclusively until the mid ’00s and the advent of the Kindle, which meant I didn’t need to make space on my already bulging bookshelves, and romance – especially historicals – became that much more accessible. Even the paperback Balogh, Duran, Carlyle etc. I bought then were largely US imports.

Last edited 1 year ago by Caz Owens
Lil

I love Stella Riley’s books. I’m always torn between the English Civil War ones and the Georgian ones, but The Black Madonna is, I think, my favorite.

Sarah

100% agree!

Caz Owens

The Civil War series is SO good – but yes, The Black Madonna is probably the standout. Luciano is such a terrific hero.

Kate

I read one of Victoria Holt’s, either Menfreya or Mistress of Mellyn, when I was very young, possibly still in primary school. It was serialised in a women’s magazine which my mother bought every week. I was a big Mary Stewart fan also in my early teens and then started reading Georgette Heyer and my love of her books still endures whereas I’m not sure I would wish to reread Holt’s Gothic tales.

Lil

I never much liked Victoria Holt, though she was recommended by a librarian who saw I liked Mary Stewart. Holt always seemed too humorless to me.

Dabney Grinnan

I started with Dame Cartland and after gobbling handfuls of them like the candy they were, a older babysitter–who had an inappropriate crush on my dad–gave Sweet, Savage Love, The Wolf and the Dove, and Memoirs of an Ex-Prom Queen.

Sweet, Savage Love, as I’ve written about here before, changed my life. (It made me realize, for starters, at age 13, that sex in its many forms–whenever I started doing THAT–should be pleasurable!)

nblibgirl

Like you Dabney, my first traditional romance was a Barbara Cartland. A woman I babysat for at about age 14 or 15 had stacks of romances that she loaned me. The only one that stood out for me was Cartland’s No Darkness for Love, and it didn’t take long for me to get bored. They were too short and too much the same. I didn’t read another “romance” until I was required to read a Georgette Heyer in library school. More Heyer, Sara Donati’s Into The Wilderness and every Diana Gabaldon that was in print at the time (maybe book 3?) followed. I was hooked.